The standardized letter of evaluation in emergency medicine: Are the qualifications useful?
- PMID: 34222747
- PMCID: PMC8194319
- DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10607
The standardized letter of evaluation in emergency medicine: Are the qualifications useful?
Abstract
Objectives: The standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in emergency medicine (EM) is a widely used metric for determining interview invitations and ranking of candidates. Previous research has questioned the validity of certain sections of the SLOE. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the qualifications for EM section, which evaluates seven attributes of applicants. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the qualifications questions and grades, global assessment, and anticipated rank list position for EM applicants.
Methods: A multi-institutional cross-sectional study was performed using SLOEs from applicants to three geographically distinct U.S. EM residency programs during the 2019-2020 application cycle. We abstracted EM rotation grade, qualifications scores, global assessment, and anticipated rank list position from the SLOEs. A Spearman correlation was calculated between each of the qualifications scores and the applicant's grades, global assessment, and anticipated rank list position in a pairwise fashion.
Results: In total, 2,106 unique applicants (4,939 SLOEs) were included. Of the seven qualifications for EM questions, three were moderately to strongly correlated with global assessment and anticipated rank list position: "ability to develop and justify an appropriate differential and a cohesive treatment plan" (ρ = 0.65 and ρ = 0.63, respectively; p < 0.001), "how much guidance do you predict this applicant will need during residency?" (ρ = 0.68 and ρ = 0.68, respectively; p < 0.001), and "what is your prediction of success for the applicant?" (ρ = 0.69 and ρ = 0.69, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no strong correlation between the seven qualifications and grades.
Conclusions: There was a moderate to strong correlation between three of seven qualifications for EM questions (ability to develop and justify a differential and develop a cohesive plan, anticipated need for the amount of guidance, and prediction of success) with both global assessment and anticipated rank list position, suggesting that these qualifications may provide the most useful data to residency selection while some of the other factors may not be needed.
© 2021 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Gender differences in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10740. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10740. eCollection 2022 Apr. AEM Educ Train. 2022. PMID: 35493289 Free PMC article.
-
Ethnic and Racial Differences in Ratings in the Medical Student Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE).J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):549-553. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01174.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 36274773 Free PMC article.
-
Lower-Third SLOE Rankings Impede, But Do Not Prevent, A Match in Emergency Medicine Residency Training.J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Dec 17;7:2382120520980487. doi: 10.1177/2382120520980487. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020. PMID: 33415307 Free PMC article.
-
The Standardized Letter of Evaluation: How We Perceive the Quiet Student.West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 27;24(2):259-263. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.12.56137. West J Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36976603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validity Evidence for the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Aug;13(4):490-499. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01110.1. Epub 2021 Aug 13. J Grad Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 34434509 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and characteristics of group standardized letters of evaluation in emergency medicine: A cross-sectional observational study.AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jan 11;9(1):e11057. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11057. eCollection 2025 Feb. AEM Educ Train. 2025. PMID: 39803611
-
Automated abstraction of information from standard letters of evaluation: A resource for file review and research.AEM Educ Train. 2024 Mar 25;8(2):e10972. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10972. eCollection 2024 Apr. AEM Educ Train. 2024. PMID: 38532739 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Gender differences in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10740. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10740. eCollection 2022 Apr. AEM Educ Train. 2022. PMID: 35493289 Free PMC article.
-
Ethnic and Racial Differences in Ratings in the Medical Student Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE).J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):549-553. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01174.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 36274773 Free PMC article.
-
The standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in emergency medicine: The internal validity of the SLOE 2.0.AEM Educ Train. 2025 Feb 14;9(1):e70000. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70000. eCollection 2025 Feb. AEM Educ Train. 2025. PMID: 39959258
References
-
- Nelson LS, Keim SM, Baren JM, et al. American Board of Emergency Medicine report on residency and fellowship training information (2017–2018). Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(5):636‐648. - PubMed
-
- Love JN, Smith J, Weizberg M, et al. Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors’ standardized letter of recommendation: the program director’s perspective. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(6):680‐687. - PubMed
-
- Results of the 2020 NRMP Program Director Survey . The National Resident Matching Program. 2020. Accessed March 24, 2021. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp‐content/uploads/2020/08/2020...
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources