Knowledge gaps in the understanding of fertility among non-medical graduate students
- PMID: 34223241
- PMCID: PMC8244259
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.08.002
Knowledge gaps in the understanding of fertility among non-medical graduate students
Abstract
Objective: To assess knowledge of female and male fertility among students enrolled in a Master of Business Administration (MBA) program.
Design: Web-based cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Academic setting.
Patients: Not applicable.
Interventions: None.
Main outcome measures: Knowledge of how female and male age impacts reproduction, fecundability, and success rates with in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Results: A total of 133 female and male MBA students completed the survey. Nearly 10% of participants were not aware that women are born with a fixed number of oocytes and that oocyte quantity and quality decline with age. More than 30% of participants overestimated fecundability in women aged ≥35 years, and >50% overestimated IVF success rates in women older than 40 years. Fifteen percent of participants did not know that men have stem cells in the testes, and >25% were not aware that men experience a decrease in sperm concentration and quality with age. Nearly 30% believed that a man's age never impacts reproductive outcomes. Less than 30% of participants correctly estimated fecundability and IVF success rates based on male age.
Conclusions: These data highlight important knowledge gaps in a highly educated group of MBA students, most whom desire future childbearing. Specifically, there is a lack of understanding of both male and female reproductive aging and an overestimation of treatment success. As delayed childbearing continues, particularly among those with high educational attainment, attention should be focused on introducing broad fertility education at a younger age to improve future reproductive success.
Keywords: Fertility knowledge; delayed childbearing; female fertility; male fertility; reproductive aging.
© 2020 The Authors.
Figures
Comment in
-
From sex-ed to fertility-ed: a more holistic approach to reproductive education.F S Rep. 2020 Oct 31;1(3):166-167. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.10.007. eCollection 2020 Dec. F S Rep. 2020. PMID: 34228035 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Wyndham N., Marin Figueira P.G., Patrizio P. A persistent misperception: assisted reproductive technology can reverse the “aged biological clock.”. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1044–1047. - PubMed
-
- Kudesia R., Chernyak E., McAvey B. Low fertility awareness in United States reproductive-aged women and medical trainees: creation and validation of the Fertility & Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS) Fertil Steril. 2017;108:711–717. - PubMed
-
- Shao Y.H., Tulandi T., Abenhaim H.A. evaluating the quality and reliability of online information on social fertility preservation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42:561–567. - PubMed
-
- Lampic C., Svanberg A.S., Karlström P., Tydén T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:558–564. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
