Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Clinician-Expressed Empathy in Advanced Cancer Consultations and Associations with Patient Outcomes
- PMID: 34223461
- PMCID: PMC8241346
- DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0052
Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Clinician-Expressed Empathy in Advanced Cancer Consultations and Associations with Patient Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Empathy is a cornerstone of effective communication. However, clinicians' and patients' perceptions of clinician-expressed empathy might differ. The independent perceptions of patients and clinicians on clinician-expressed empathy in advanced cancer consultations and the associations of these perceptions with patient outcomes are unknown. Objective: We assessed (1) patients' and clinicians' independent perceptions of clinician-(self-)expressed empathy in advanced cancer consultations and (2) the associations between these perceptions and affective patient outcomes. Methods: This observational study included data from 41 consultations in the advanced breast cancer setting. Postconsultation, patients' and clinicians' perceptions of clinician-expressed empathy were assessed, as well as patients' (1) pre-post anxiety, (2) post-anxiety, (3) emotional well-being, and (4) satisfaction. Multilevel regression analyses were run to draw conclusions. Results: Patients perceived higher levels of empathy than clinicians, without a significant relationship between the two (mean [M] = 85.47, standard deviation [SD] = 14.00 vs. M = 61.88, SD = 15.30, 0-100 scale; β = 0.14, p < 0.138, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.04 to 0.32). Higher patient-perceived empathy was associated with decreased anxiety [(1) β = -0.67, p = 0.039, 95% CI = -1.30 to -0.03; (2) β = -0.15, p = 0.042, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.01], higher satisfaction (β = 0.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.08), and lower emotional distress (β = -0.32, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -0.48 to -0.16). There were no associations with clinicians' perceptions [(1) β = -0.34, p = 0.307, 95% CI = -1.00 to 0.31; (2) β = -0.02, p = 0.824, 95% CI = -0.17 to 0.14; (3) β < 0.01, p = 0.918, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.02; (4) β = 0.08, p = 0.335, 95% CI = -0.08 to 0.25]. Conclusions: Patients' and clinicians' empathy perceptions differed. In improving patient outcomes, the focus should be on patients' perceptions of clinician-expressed empathy. Future research could focus on ways to elicit patients' perceptions of empathy with the higher aim of improving patient outcomes.
Keywords: communication; empathy; palliative care; patient outcomes.
© Hinke Hoffstädt et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
-
- de Haes H, Bensing J: Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009;74:287–294 - PubMed
-
- Street RL Jr., Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM: How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009;74:295–301 - PubMed
-
- Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow PN, et al. : A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1361–1366 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources