Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 29;30(2):76-86.
doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2285Muehlemann11.

Accuracy of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Technologies

Affiliations

Accuracy of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Technologies

E Muehlemann et al. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. .

Abstract

This study analyzed the fit accuracy of the removable partial denture (RPD) metal frameworks produced using digital and conventional manufacturing technologies. Mandibular RPD metal frameworks (N=15, n=3 per group) were fabricated on a representative clinical case. RPDs were fabricated using one of the following manufacturing procedures: a) conventional lost-wax casting technique (C-LW), b) conventional casting of milled sacrificial patterns (C-M), c) conventional casting of printed sacrificial patterns (C-P), d) selective laser melting (SLM), e) direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technologies. The fit accuracy of RPD frameworks was analyzed by fabricating replicas with silicone registration material and measuring with a digital microscope. A total of 11 sites and 29 areas in the RPD metal frameworks were considered for the accuracy measurements (μm). Data were statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank and Friedman test (α=0.05). Before finishing and polishing, C-M method presented overall significantly better (P⟨.001) fit accuracy (118 μm) than those of other methods (195-265 μm). After finishing and polishing, C-M method showed overall significantly better (P⟨.033) fit accuracy (205.7 μm) than C-LW and SLM methods (285.7 μm; 249 μm) and comparable fit accuracy to that of C-P and DMLS methods. Accuracy at the minor and major connector areas of RPDs were affected from the manufacturing technologies. Clinical Implications: When accuracy of RPDs are considered, digital technologies tested presented similar results to those of conventional manufacturing method except for minor and major connector areas which necessitates further improvement.

Keywords: 3D Printing; Additive Manufacturing Technologies; Direct Metal Laser Sintering; Metal Framework; Removable Partial Dentures; Selective Laser-Melting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources