Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Sep;16(5):553-568.
doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00824-3. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Fausto Petrelli et al. Target Oncol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown.

Objectives: This study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients and methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched up to 1 December 2020. Randomized trials comparing any ICI alone, with chemotherapy (CT), or with other agents versus placebo, CT, or other agents were included. Three independent reviewers extracted the data. The primary outcome was the RR of all-grade (G) and G3-5 infections for patients receiving ICI-based treatments. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to statistical heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 21,451 patients from N = 36 studies were eligible. ICIs were associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.24; P = 0.85) versus non-ICI treatments (G1-5 events: 9.6 versus 8.3%). When the ICIs alone were compared to CT, their use was associated with 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4-0.85; P = 0.01). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.53; P < 0.01) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.96; P < 0.01). In anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, monotherapy, and combination trials, the RR of all-grade infections was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49-1.05; P = 0.09), 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.46; P = 0.13), 1.74 (95% CI 1.13-2.67; P = 0.01), 0.97 (95% CI 0.79-1.19; P = 0.75) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.34-3.8; P < 0.01), respectively.

Conclusions: Compared to CT alone, ICIs were safer and are recommended for frail patients. Conversely, CT + ICIs or ICIs combinations increased infection risk. Further studies are required to identify high-risk patients and evaluate the need for CT dose reduction or prophylactic myeloid growth factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Fausto Petrelli, Anna Maria Morelli, Andrea Luciani, Antonio Ghidini, and Cinzia Solinas declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the included studies.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the risk ratio for all-grade infections.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the risk ratio for grade 3–5 infections.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the risk ratio for all-grade infections for chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy-alone studies.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of the risk ratio for all-grade infections for immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone studies.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of the risk ratio for all-grade infections for immune checkpoint inhibitors versus placebo/best supportive care studies.

References

    1. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer. 2006 doi: 10.1002/cncr.21847. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klastersky J, Paesmans M. The multinational association for supportive care in cancer (MASCC) risk index score: 10 years of use for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1758-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barber DL, Sakai S, Kudchadkar RR, Fling SP, Day TA, Vergara JA, et al. Tuberculosis following PD-1 blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Sci Transl Med. 2019 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat2702. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Picchi H, Mateus C, Chouaid C, Besse B, Marabelle A, Michot JM, et al. Infectious complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncology: reactivation of tuberculosis after anti PD-1 treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Del Castillo M, Romero FA, Argüello E, Kyi C, Postow MA, Redelman-Sidi G. The spectrum of serious infections among patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of melanoma. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw539. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances