The hidden burden of unplanned readmission after emergency general surgery
- PMID: 34225343
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003325
The hidden burden of unplanned readmission after emergency general surgery
Abstract
Background: There are no national studies of nonelective readmissions after emergency general surgery (EGS) diagnoses that track nonindex hospital readmission. We sought to determine the rate of overall and nonindex hospital readmissions at 30 and 90 days after discharge for EGS diagnoses, hypothesizing a significant portion would be to nonindex hospitals.
Methods: The 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for all patients 16 years or older admitted with an EGS primary diagnosis and survived index hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors for nonelective 30- and 90-day readmission to index and nonindex hospitals.
Results: Of 4,171,983 patients, 13% experienced unplanned readmission at 30 days. Of these, 21% were admitted to a nonindex hospital. By 90 days, 22% experienced an unplanned readmission, of which 23% were to a nonindex hospital. The most common reason for readmission was infection. Publicly insured or uninsured patients accounted for 67% of admissions and 77% of readmissions. Readmission predictors at 30 days included leaving against medical advice (odds ratio [OR], 2.51 [2.47-2.56]), increased length of stay (4-7 days: OR, 1.42 [1.41-1.43]; >7 days: OR, 2.04 [2.02-2.06]), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR, 1.72 [1.71-1.73]), public insurance (Medicare: OR, 1.45 [1.44-1.46]; Medicaid: OR, 1.38 [1.37-1.40]), EGS patients who fell into the "Other" surgical category (OR, 1.42 [1.38-1.48]), and nonroutine discharge. Risk factors for readmission remained consistent at 90 days.
Conclusion: Given that nonindex hospital EGS readmission accounts for nearly a quarter of readmissions and often related to important benchmarks such as infection, current EGS quality metrics are inaccurate. This has implications for policy, benchmarking, and readmission reduction programs.
Level of evidence: Epidemiological study, level III.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Napolitano LM, Fulda GJ, Davis KA, Ashley DW, Friese R, Van Way CW 3rd, Meredith JW, Fabian TC, Jurkovich GJ, Peitzman AB. Challenging issues in surgical critical care, trauma, and acute care surgery: a report from the critical care committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma . 2010;69(6):1619–1633.
-
- Shafi S, Aboutanos MB, Agarwal S Jr., et al. Emergency general surgery: definition and estimated burden of disease. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2013;74(4):1092–1097.
-
- Nelson BV, Talboy GE Jr. Acute care surgery: redefining the general surgeon. Mo Med . 2010;107(5):313–315.
-
- Voelker R. Experts say projected surgeon shortage a “looming crisis” for patient care. JAMA . 2009;302(14):1520–1521.
-
- Ingraham AM, Haas B, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Nathens AB. Comparison of hospital performance in trauma vs emergency and elective general surgery: implications for acute care surgery quality improvement. Arch Surg . 2012;147(7):591–598.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials