Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan;53(2):497-512.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001859. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training in adolescent boys with ADHD: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training in adolescent boys with ADHD: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial

Samuel J Westwood et al. Psychol Med. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could be a side-effect-free alternative to psychostimulants in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is limited evidence for clinical and cognitive effects, most studies were small, single-session and stimulated left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). No sham-controlled study has stimulated the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), which is the most consistently under-functioning region in ADHD, with multiple anodal-tDCS sessions combined with cognitive training (CT) to enhance effects. Thus, we investigated the clinical and cognitive effects of multi-session anodal-tDCS over rIFC combined with CT in double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial (RCT, ISRCTN48265228).

Methods: Fifty boys with ADHD (10-18 years) received 15 weekday sessions of anodal- or sham-tDCS over rIFC combined with CT (20 min, 1 mA). ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline measures, age and medication status, tested group differences in clinical and ADHD-relevant executive functions at posttreatment and after 6 months.

Results: ADHD-Rating Scale, Conners ADHD Index and adverse effects were significantly lower at post-treatment after sham relative to anodal tDCS. No other effects were significant.

Conclusions: This rigorous and largest RCT of tDCS in adolescent boys with ADHD found no evidence of improved ADHD symptoms or cognitive performance following multi-session anodal tDCS over rIFC combined with CT. These findings extend limited meta-analytic evidence of cognitive and clinical effects in ADHD after 1-5 tDCS sessions over mainly left dlPFC. Given that tDCS is commercially and clinically available, the findings are important as they suggest that rIFC stimulation may not be indicated as a neurotherapy for cognitive or clinical remediation for ADHD.

Keywords: ADHD; randomised controlled trial; tDCS; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CONSORT flow diagram (Moher et al., 2010) of this RCT from enrolment, intervention allocation, follow-up and analysis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Schematic overview of the study design. ADHD-RS, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale; ARI, Affective Reactivity Index; CIS, Columbia Impairment Scale; Conners 3-P, Conners' 3rd Edition Parent Rating; Cognitive battery, Maudsley Attention and Response Suppression task battery, vigilance, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, visual-spatial working memory, verbal fluency; K-SADS-PL, Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version; MEWS, Mind Excessively Wandering Scale; SCQ, Social Communication Questionnaire (Lifetime), SDQ, Social Difficulties Questionnaire (prosocial scale only); WASI-II, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, 2nd Edition; WREMB-R, Weekly Rating of Evening and Morning Behavior-Revised.

References

    1. Alegria, A. A., Wulff, M., Brinson, H., Barker, G. J., Norman, L. J., Brandeis, D., … Rubia, K. (2017). Real-time fMRI neurofeedback in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Human Brain Mapping, 38(6), 3190–3209. 10.1002/hbm.23584 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allenby, C., Falcone, M., Bernardo, L., Wileyto, E. P., Rostain, A., Ramsay, J. R., … Loughead, J. (2018). Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD. Brain Stimulation, 11(5), 974–981. 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. Antal, A., Alekseichuk, I., Bikson, M., Brockmöller, J., Brunoni, A. R., Chen, R., … Paulus, W. (2017). Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(9), 1774–1809. 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 177–185. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms