Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;61(4):696-709.
doi: 10.1111/jors.12539. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Learning from deregulation: The asymmetric impact of lockdown and reopening on risky behavior during COVID-19

Affiliations

Learning from deregulation: The asymmetric impact of lockdown and reopening on risky behavior during COVID-19

Edward L Glaeser et al. J Reg Sci. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, states issued and then rescinded stay-at-home orders that restricted mobility. We develop a model of learning by deregulation, which predicts that lifting stay-at-home orders can signal that going out has become safer. Using restaurant activity data, we find that the implementation of stay-at-home orders initially had a limited impact, but that activity rose quickly after states' reopenings. The results suggest that consumers inferred from reopening that it was safer to eat out. The rational, but mistaken inference that occurs in our model may explain why a sharp rise of COVID-19 cases followed reopening in some states.

Keywords: COVID‐19; coronavirus; mobility; public health measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nationwide average responses. (a) The average of each measure of mobility and restaurant activity, centered around stay‐at‐home and reopening dates. (b) Yelp Reservations, SafeGraph visits to all places‐of‐interest, and SafeGraph visits to full‐service restaurants for three states. Due to a high degree of day‐of‐week variation, each line presents a trend line of the outcome of interest, calculated using a LOESS seasonal‐trend decomposer [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
COVID‐19 cases and full‐service restaurant visits after reopening. (a) States are grouped based on whether the number of new cases in the week after reopening is more (“Bad Signal”) or less (“Good Signal”) than the number of new cases in the week prior to before reopening. (b) The same approach, using the change in cases in the week prior to before reopening relative to the change in cases 2 weeks prior to before reopening. Data is relative to the value on each state's reopening. Each line presents a trend line of the outcome of interest, calculated using a LOESS seasonal‐trend decomposer. The following states are excluded from these figures because of insufficient data in the postreopening period: CO, DE, IL, MA, MI, MN, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and WA [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Allcott, H. , Boxell, L. , Conway, J. , Gentzkow, M. , Thaler, M. , & Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Besley, T. (2007). Principled agents?: The political economy of good government (The Lindahl Lectures). Oxford University Press.
    1. Brzezinski, A. , Deiana, G. , Kecht, V. , & Van Dijcke, D. (2020). The COVID‐19 pandemic: Government vs. community action across the United States. Covid economics: Vetted and real‐time papers 7 (CEPR), (pp. 115–156). https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/news/CovidEconomics7.pdf
    1. Brzezinski, A. , Kecht, V. , & Van Dijcke, D. (2020). The cost of staying open: voluntary social distancing and lockdowns in the US. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.3614494 - DOI
    1. Chudik, A. , Pesaran, M. H. , & Rebucci, A. (2020). Voluntary and mandatory social distancing: Evidence on COVID‐19 exposure rates from chinese provinces and selected countries. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Globalization Institute Working Papers). 382. 10.24149/gwp382 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources