GFP-fused yeast cells as whole-cell biosensors for genotoxicity evaluation of nitrosamines
- PMID: 34228183
- DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11426-4
GFP-fused yeast cells as whole-cell biosensors for genotoxicity evaluation of nitrosamines
Abstract
Nitrosamine compounds, represented by N-nitrosodimethylamine, are regarded as potentially genotoxic impurities (PGIs) due to their hazard warning structure, which has attracted great attention of pharmaceutical companies and regulatory authorities. At present, great research gaps exist in genotoxicity assessment and carcinogenicity comparison of nitrosamine compounds. In this work, a collection of GFP-fused yeast cells representing DNA damage repair pathways were used to evaluate the genotoxicity of eight nitrosamine compounds (10-6-105 μg/mL). The high-resolution expression profiles of GFP-fused protein revealed the details of the DNA damage repair of nitrosamines. Studies have shown that nitrosamine compounds can cause extensive DNA damage and activate multiple repair pathways. The evaluation criteria based on the total expression level of protein show a good correlation with the mammalian carcinogenicity data TD50, and the yeast cell collection can be used as a potential reliable criterion for evaluating the carcinogenicity of compounds. The assay based on DNA damage pathway integration has high sensitivity and can be used as a supplementary method for the evaluation of trace PGIs in actual production. KEY POINTS: • The genotoxicity mechanism of nitrosamines was systematically studied. • The influence of compound structure on the efficacy of genotoxicity was explored. • GFP-fused yeast cells have the potential to evaluate impurities in production.
Keywords: Carcinogenicity; DNA damage repair; Genotoxicity; Nitrosamine compounds; Substituent.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the nitrosamine impurities of ACE inhibitors using computational, in vitro, and in vivo methods demonstrate no genotoxic potential.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2024 Jul;65(6-7):203-221. doi: 10.1002/em.22618. Epub 2024 Aug 24. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2024. PMID: 39180320
-
Genotoxicity of a Low-Dose Nitrosamine Mixture as Drinking Water Disinfection Byproducts in NIH3T3 Cells.Int J Med Sci. 2017 Aug 18;14(10):961-969. doi: 10.7150/ijms.20121. eCollection 2017. Int J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28924367 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Metal-Organic Gel Protected Whole-Cell Biosensor for in Situ Monitoring Nitrosamines in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Nano Lett. 2022 Nov 9;22(21):8688-8694. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03418. Epub 2022 Oct 20. Nano Lett. 2022. PMID: 36264028
-
Are all nitrosamines concerning? A review of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;116:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104749. Epub 2020 Aug 7. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32777431 Review.
-
Yeast-based genotoxicity tests for assessing DNA alterations and DNA stress responses: a 40-year overview.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;102(6):2493-2507. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8783-1. Epub 2018 Feb 8. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 29423630 Review.
Cited by
-
Sensing chemical-induced DNA damage using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-deletion yeast-reporter strains.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 1;108(1):188. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13020-w. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 38300351 Free PMC article.
-
Trace Level Quantification of 4-Methyl-1-nitrosopiperazin in Rifampicin Capsules by LC-MS/MS.Front Chem. 2022 Feb 14;10:834124. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.834124. eCollection 2022. Front Chem. 2022. PMID: 35237562 Free PMC article.
-
Protein Biomarkers of DNA Damage in Yeast Cells for Genotoxicity Screening.Environ Health (Wash). 2024 Nov 14;3(3):250-258. doi: 10.1021/envhealth.4c00160. eCollection 2025 Mar 21. Environ Health (Wash). 2024. PMID: 40144325 Free PMC article.
-
Screening and application of functional autochthonous starter culture from cured meat, which can reduce nitrite content.Int Microbiol. 2025 Jun;28(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s10123-024-00606-7. Epub 2024 Oct 14. Int Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 39400630
References
-
- Ahn JM, Hwang ET, Youn CH, Banu DL, Kim BC, Niazi JH, Gu MB (2009) Prediction and classification of the modes of genotoxic actions using bacterial biosensors specific for DNA damages. Biosens Bioelectron 25(4):767–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2009.08.025 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E, Lee FD (1973) Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70(8):2281–2285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.8.2281 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ames BN, Mccann J, Yamasaki E (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31(6):347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(75)90046-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arranz N, Haza AI, García A, Rafter J, Morales P (2007) Protective effect of vitamin C towards N-nitrosamine-induced DNA damage in the single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE)/HepG2 assay. Toxicol in Vitro 21(7):1311–1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2007.03.015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Attene-Ramos MS, Wagner ED, Piewa MJ (2010) Comparative human cell toxicogenomic analysis of monohaloacetic acid drinking water disinfection byproducts. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7206–7212. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1000193 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases