Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 6;15(7):e0009564.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009564. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Assessing clinicians' Post-Exposure Prophylaxis recommendations for rabies virus exposures in Hunan Province, China

Affiliations

Assessing clinicians' Post-Exposure Prophylaxis recommendations for rabies virus exposures in Hunan Province, China

Yu Li et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Timely and appropriate administration of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an essential component of human rabies prevention programs. We evaluated patient care at rabies clinics in a high-risk county in Hunan Province, China to inform strategies needed to achieve dog-mediated human rabies elimination by 2030.

Methods: We collected information on PEP, staff capacity, and service availability at the 17 rabies clinics in the high-risk county during onsite visits and key staff interviews. Additionally, we conducted observational assessments at five of these clinics, identified through purposive sampling to capture real-time information on patient care during a four-week period. Wound categories assigned by trained observers were considered accurate per national guidelines for comparison purposes. We used the kappa statistic and an alpha level of 0.05 to assess agreement between observers and clinic staff.

Results: In 2015, the 17 clinics provided PEP to 5,261 patients. Although rabies vaccines were available at all 17 clinics, rabies immune globulin (RIG) was only available at the single urban clinic in the county. During the assessment period in 2016, 196 patients sought care for possible rabies virus exposures. According to observers, 88 (44%) patients had category III wounds, 104 (53%) had category II wounds and 4 (2%) had category I wounds. Observers and PEP clinic staff agreed on approximately half of the assigned wound categories (kappa = 0.55, p-value< 0.001). Agreement for the urban county-level CDC clinic (kappa = 0.93, p-value<0.001) was higher than for the township clinics (kappa = 0.16, p-value = 0.007). Using observer assigned wound categories, 142 (73%) patients received rabies vaccinations and RIG as outlined in the national guidelines.

Conclusion: Rabies PEP services were available at each town of the project county; however, gaps between clinical practice and national rabies guidelines on the use of PEP were identified. We used these findings to develop and implement a training to rabies clinic staff on wound categorization, wound care, and appropriate use of PEP. Additional risk-based approaches for evaluating human rabies virus exposures may be needed as China progresses towards elimination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Location of rabies PEP project county A, Hunan Province, China, 2016.
Project county is one of 122 counties in Hunan Province. The base layer of the map is from Natural Earth (https://www.naturalearthdata.com/).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Snapshots from rabies PEP clinics in project county A, Hunan Province, China, July–August, 2016.
(A) Facility for wound washing at the urban clinic. (B) Facility for wound washing at a rural clinic. (C) Facility for wound washing at a second rural clinic. (D) Soap used for wound washing at a rural clinic. (E) Area for vaccination and RIG administration at the urban clinic. (F) Area for vaccination at a rural clinic.

References

    1. Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fevre EM, Meltzer MI, Miranda ME, et al.. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83(5): 360–8. doi: /S0042-96862005000500012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hampson K, Dobson A, Kaare M, Dushoff J, Magoto M, Sindoya E, et al.. Rabies exposures, post-exposure prophylaxis and deaths in a region of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008; 2(11): e339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000339 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarvis S. Aiming for elimination of dog-mediated human rabies cases by 2030. Vet Rec. 2016; 178(4): 86–7. doi: 10.1136/vr.i51 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Rabies vaccines: WHO position paper, April 2018—Recommendations. Vaccine. 2018; 36(37): 5500–3. - PubMed
    1. Li AJ, Sreenivasan N, Siddiqi UR, Tahmina S, Penjor K, Sovann L, et al.. Descriptive assessment of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis procurement, distribution, monitoring, and reporting in four Asian countries: Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka, 2017–2018. Vaccine. 2018. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances