Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20210746.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0746. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

Quantifying variation in female internal genitalia: no evidence for plasticity in response to sexual conflict risk in a seed beetle

Affiliations

Quantifying variation in female internal genitalia: no evidence for plasticity in response to sexual conflict risk in a seed beetle

Blake W Wyber et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Sexually antagonistic coevolution can drive the evolution of male traits that harm females, and female resistance to those traits. While males have been found to vary their harmfulness to females in response to social cues, plasticity in female resistance traits remains to be examined. Here, we ask whether female seed beetles Callosobruchus maculatus are capable of adjusting their resistance to male harm in response to the social environment. Among seed beetles, male genital spines harm females during copulation and females might resist male harm via thickening of the reproductive tract walls. We develop a novel micro computed tomography imaging technique to quantify female reproductive tract thickness in three-dimensional space, and compared the reproductive tracts of females from populations that had evolved under high and low levels of sexual conflict, and for females reared under a social environment that predicted either high or low levels of sexual conflict. We find little evidence to suggest that females can adjust the thickness of their reproductive tracts in response to the social environment. Neither did evolutionary history affect reproductive tract thickness. Nevertheless, our novel methodology was capable of quantifying fine-scale differences in the internal reproductive tracts of individual females, and will allow future investigations into the internal organs of insects and other animals.

Keywords: experimental evolution; female genital evolution; phenotypic plasticity; sex ratio; sexual conflict; sexually antagonistic coevolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Segmentation of the reproductive tract: (a) first appearance of the entrance of the spermathecal duct, (b) first appearance of the bursal teeth. Tract wall thickness: (c) three-dimensional thickness heat map, (d) upper and lower regions of interest within the reproductive tract. (Online version in colour.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parker GA. 2006. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 235-259. (10.1098/rstb.2005.1785) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Stockley P. 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 154-159. (10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01000-8) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edvardsson M, Tregenza T. 2005. Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behav. Ecol. 16, 788-793. (10.1093/beheco/ari055) - DOI
    1. Rankin DJ, Dieckmann U, Kokko H. 2011. Sexual conflict and the tragedy of the commons. Am. Nat. 177, 780-791. (10.1086/659947) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources