Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;44(9):1423-1429.
doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02865-7. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

Efficiency and Safety of Balloon-Assisted Gastrostomy

Affiliations

Efficiency and Safety of Balloon-Assisted Gastrostomy

Gilbert Maroun et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the safety and efficiency of balloon-assisted gastrostomy for insertion of large bore feeding tubes compared to conventional techniques using dilators.

Materials and methods: Retrospective review of all fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy tube insertions between July 2017 and September 2019 was performed. Collected data points included patient demographics, initial pathology, type of gastrostomy tube (G tube) inserted [(Avanos standard balloon retained (Mic-G), or low-profile balloon retained (Mic-Key)], type of insertion technique (balloon-assisted or -nested dilator technique), fluoroscopy time, amount of sedation required, technical success, and complications. The focus of the study was method of tract dilatation - either balloon-assisted gastrostomy (BAG group) versus nested or sequential dilators (dilator group). Two hundred patients were included in this study; 100 patients were evaluated in each group.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups. The overall rate of minor complications (grades 1 and 2, according to the CIRSE classification system) was higher in the dilator group (11%, compared to 7% in the BAG group) but did not reach statistical significance. Males were associated with lower risk of minor complications (OR 0.19, 95% CI (0.07, 0.53)), while age did not present a significant association. Patients in the BAG group received a significantly lower amount of fentanyl (p < 0.001) and midazolam (p < 0.001) than patients in the dilator group.

Conclusion: Balloon-assisted gastrostomy is a safe and effective technique for large bore gastrostomy placement. Patients required less sedation, allowing for faster recovery and discharge time in outpatients at our institution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wiggins TF, Garrow DA, DeLegge MH. Evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic feeding tube placement in obese patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24(6):723–7. - DOI
    1. Chan SC, Ko SF, Ng SH, Cheung YC, Chang JTC, Liao CT, Wang HM, Lui KW. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy with modified gastropexy and a large bore balloon retained catheter in patients with head and neck tumors. Acta Radiol. 2004;45(2):130–5. - DOI
    1. Bendel EC, McKusick MA, Fleming CJ, Friese JL, Woodrum DA, et al. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy catheter placement without gastropexy: a co-axial balloon technique and evaluation of safety and efficacy. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41(11):2227–32. - DOI
    1. Thornton FJ, Fotherngham T, Haslam PJ, et al. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy with and without T-fastener gastropexy: a randomized comparison study. Cardiovasc Internv Radiol. 2002;25(6):467–71. - DOI
    1. Ryan JM, Hahn PF, Boland GW, McDowell RK, Saini S, Mueller PR. Percutaneous gastrostomy with T-fastener gastropexy: results of 316 consecutive procedures. Radiology. 1997;203(2):496–500. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources