Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 1;27(5):368-373.
doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000805.

The progressive fibrotic phenotype in current clinical practice

Affiliations
Review

The progressive fibrotic phenotype in current clinical practice

Athol U Wells et al. Curr Opin Pulm Med. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The progressive fibrotic phenotype (PFP), a term that covers large sub-groups of patients with fibrotic lung diseases that clinically progress despite appropriate usual management, is now an everyday problem for patients and clinicians alike. This review covers recent data that are relevant to major clinical uncertainties.

Recent findings: The clinical relevance of the PFP is covered by a brief review of data from which this entity was constructed. Estimates of the prevalence of the PFP are cited. The importance of an accurate initial diagnosis is emphasized - with refutation of the belief that diagnosis now matters less because of recent antifibrotic trial data. Pivotal trials are reviewed briefly with emphasis on the range of diseases studied and the efficacy signals. Included in this section are analyses of treatment effects in individual diseases and data that validate the progression criteria that define the PFP.

Summary: Clinicians can now implement the findings from recent antifibrotic trials in non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis lung diseases. However, the appropriate application of recent data requires an understanding of the critical importance of initial diagnosis, key measures of disease progression and knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of trial data. Important clinical uncertainties not informed by current data include the evaluation of the adequacy of traditional management (before antifibrotic therapy is introduced) and agreement on the exact definition of disease progression that should trigger consideration of antifibrotic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wells A. Albert RK, Spiro SG, Jett JR. Approach to diagnosis of diffuse lung disease. Clinical respiratory medicine. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier; 2004. 647–656.
    1. Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, et al. ATS/ERS Committee on Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:733–748.
    1. Wells AU, Brown KK, Flaherty KR, et al. IPF Consensus Working Group. What's in a name? That which we call IPF, by any other name would act the same. Eur Respir J 2018; 51:1800692doi: 10.1183/13993003.00692-2018. - DOI
    1. Cottin V, Hirani NA, Hotchkin DL, et al. Presentation, diagnosis and clinical course of the spectrum of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev 2018; 27:180076doi: 10.1183/16000617.0076-2018. - DOI
    1. Latsi PI, du Bois RM, Nicholson AG, et al. Fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: the prognostic value of longitudinal functional trends. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:531–537.