Risk factors influencing fracture characteristics in postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty : a multicentre observational cohort study on 584 fractures
- PMID: 34233455
- PMCID: PMC8325979
- DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0027.R1
Risk factors influencing fracture characteristics in postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty : a multicentre observational cohort study on 584 fractures
Abstract
Aims: This study evaluates risk factors influencing fracture characteristics for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty.
Methods: Data were collected for PFF patients admitted to eight UK centres between 25 May 2006 and 1 March 2020. Radiographs were assessed for Unified Classification System (UCS) grade and AO/OTA type. Statistical comparisons investigated relationships by age, gender, and stem fixation philosophy (polished taper-slip (PTS) vs composite beam (CB)). The effect of multiple variables was estimated using multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Surgical treatment (revision vs fixation) was compared by UCS grade and AO/OTA type.
Results: A total of 584 cases were included. Median age was 79.1 years (interquartile range 72.0 to 86.0), 312 (53.6%) patients were female, and 495 (85.1%) stems were PTS. The commonest UCS grade was type B1 (278, 47.6%). The most common AO/OTA type was spiral (352, 60.3%). Metaphyseal split fractures occurred only with PTS stems with an incidence of 10.1%. Male sex was associated with a five-fold reduction in odds of a type C fracture (OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.41); p < 0.001) compared to a type B fracture. CB stems were associated with significantly increased odds of transverse fracture (OR 9.51 (95% CI 3.72 to 24.34); p < 0.001) and wedge fracture (OR 3.72 (95% CI 1.16 to 11.95); p = 0.027) compared to PTS stems. Both UCS grade and AO/OTA type differed significantly (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively) between the revision and fixation groups but a similar proportion of B1 fractures underwent revision compared to fixation (45.3% vs 50.6%).
Conclusion: The commonest fracture types are B1 and spiral fractures. PTS stems are exclusively associated with metaphyseal split fractures, but their incidence is low. Males have lower odds of UCS grade C fractures compared to females. CB stems have higher odds of bending type fractures (transverse and wedge) compared to PTS stems. There is considerable variation in practice when treating B1 fractures around cemented stems. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):466-475.
Keywords: Cemented stem; Hip arthroplasty; Hip replacement; Periprosthetic fracture.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A multicentre comparative analysis of fixation versus revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with a cemented polished taper-slip femoral component.Bone Joint J. 2023 Feb;105-B(2):124-134. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0685.R1. Bone Joint J. 2023. PMID: 36722066
-
Reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems.Bone Joint J. 2021 Aug;103-B(8):1339-1344. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B8.BJJ-2021-0021.R1. Bone Joint J. 2021. PMID: 34334039
-
Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 16;102(18):1600-1608. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01242. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020. PMID: 32604382
-
Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems - how should we treat these? A systematic scoping review and algorithm for management.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Dec 13:104110. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104110. Online ahead of print. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39675558 Review.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing the Rate of Post-operative Periprosthetic Fracture Following Hip Arthroplasty With a Polished Taper Slip versus Composite Beam Stem.J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jun 19. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 37343648
Cited by
-
Operatively Managed Transverse or Short Oblique B1 Periprosthetic Fractures Around a Polished Taper-Slip Femoral Stem Are Associated With Reoperation in One Third of Cases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Nov 13;30:101551. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101551. eCollection 2024 Dec. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39619704 Free PMC article.
-
Cumulative Risk for Periprosthetic Fracture and Operative Treatment Options After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular and Tapered Revision Device-A Consecutive Series of 117 Cases in a Mid-Term Duration.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 28;14(15):5321. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155321. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40806944 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Significance of Protective Motivation Intervention Nursing on Functional Recovery of Patients after Hip Arthroplasty.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 9;2022:4219131. doi: 10.1155/2022/4219131. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. Retraction in: Biomed Res Int. 2023 Dec 29;2023:9861286. doi: 10.1155/2023/9861286. PMID: 36119938 Free PMC article. Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors and Improvement of Clinical Treatment of Traumatic Arthritis after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 4;2022:7891007. doi: 10.1155/2022/7891007. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. Retraction in: Comput Math Methods Med. 2023 Jul 19;2023:9819065. doi: 10.1155/2023/9819065. PMID: 35572823 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Evidence-based nursing reduces complications and negative emotions and improves limb function in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):1779-1788. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 37056799 Free PMC article.
References
-
- No authors listed . National joint registry 17th annual report 2020. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2017th%20Ann... (date last accessed 15th November 2020).
-
- Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty: follow-up for 30 to 40 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B(4):447–450. - PubMed
-
- Petheram TG, Whitehouse SL, Kazi HA, et al. . The Exeter universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: a report of 382 hips. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(11):1441–1449. - PubMed
-
- Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Timperley AJ, Howell JR, Wilson MJ. The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(8):1002–1009. - PubMed