Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;50(8):20210117.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210117. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

The empirical formula for calculating the incident air Kerma in intraoral radiographic imaging

Affiliations

The empirical formula for calculating the incident air Kerma in intraoral radiographic imaging

Zoran Mirkov et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to determine the empirical formula for calculating the incident air kerma (Ki), used as a patient dose descriptor in the intraoral radiographic imaging.

Methods: The data for the formula were collected during the regular annual inspection of intraoral dental X-ray units in 2018, 2019 and early 2020. The measurement data of 50 X-ray units were processed to develop the formula. Exposure factors for imaging molars of the upper jaw of an average patient in a clinical setting were used in the measurement. The formula validity was statistically evaluated using coefficient of correlation, standard error of the fitted function and the mean relative percentage deviation.

Results: The measurement values of the radiation doses and calculated values obtained by using the final formula showed good agreement - the mean relative percentage deviation values less than ±15%.

Conclusions: Although there are differences in X-ray units, voltages, manufacturers and device architectures (single-phase and high-frequency), the measurement data comply well with computed ones in all cases.

Keywords: Air kerma; Dental x-ray; Intraoral; Ionising Radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The 3D plots for measured radiation doses (Ki) as a function of the X-ray peak tube voltage (V) and the exposure current and time product, (Ixt), visual representation in support of an empirical formula (1); surface fitting (a) and residual plot (b).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Diagnostic plots of measurement and calculated values of radiation doses (R).

Similar articles

References

    1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation .Sources and effect of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Vol. 1. New York: United Nations; 2008. http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/09-86753_Report_2008_Annex_A.pdf.
    1. Commission E. Radiation protection No. 180. Medical radiation exposure of the european population. 2014. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/content/rp-180-medical-radiation-exposure-eu....
    1. Košutić D, Božović P. Distribution of X ray units in Serbia. XXVII symposium DZZ SCG, Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia. In: In Proc. XXVII Symposium DZZ SCG, Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia; 2013. pp. 197–200.
    1. Mirkov Z. Quality control in dental radiology in Serbia: preliminary results. Rad Conference Proceedings 2017; 2: 95–8.
    1. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics for medical imaging (2nd edn). Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publisher; 2002.