Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jul 7;20(1):136.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01328-0.

A cross sectional study to compare cardiac structure and diastolic function in adolescents and young adults with youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A cross sectional study to compare cardiac structure and diastolic function in adolescents and young adults with youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Amy S Shah et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Aims: To compare left ventricular structure (LV) and diastolic function in young adults with youth- onset diabetes by type, determine the prevalence of abnormal diastolic function by diabetes type using published values from age similar healthy controls, and examine the risk factors associated with diastolic function.

Methods: In a cross sectional analysis we compared LV structure and diastolic function from two dimensional echocardiogram in participants with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) who participated in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Linear models were used to examine the risk factors associated with worse diastolic function.

Results: Of 479 participants studied, 258 had T1D (mean age 21.2 ± 5.2 years, 60.5% non-Hispanic white, 53.9% female) and 221 had T2D (mean age 24.8 ± 4.3 years, 24.4% non-Hispanic white, 73.8% female). Median diabetes duration was 11.6 years. Participants with T2D had greater LV mass index and worse diastolic function that persisted after adjustment for differences in risk factors compared with participants with T1D (all p < 0.05). Abnormal diastolic function, quantified using healthy controls, was pronounced in both groups but greater in those with T2D than T1D (T2D: 57.7% vs T1D: 47.2%, respectively), p < 0.05. Risk factors associated with worse diastolic function included older age at diabetes diagnosis, female sex, higher BP, heart rate and HbA1c and longer diabetes duration.

Conclusions: LV structure and diastolic function is worse in individuals with T2D compared to T1D. However, abnormal diastolic function in seen in both groups compared to published values from age similar healthy controls.

Keywords: Cardiac structure; Diastolic function; Pediatrics; Type 1 diabetes; Type 2 diabetes; Young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest or competing interests to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Left Ventricular Geometry and Diastolic Function by Diabetes Type. A. Distribution of Left Ventricular Geometry by Diabetes Type. Participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes were stratified into four groups according to the LV mass cutoff > 51 g/m2.7 and relative wall thickness (RWT) cutoff of > 0.41: A Normal geometry (white), b concentric remodeling (increased RWT only, light gray), c eccentric hypertrophy (increased LVM only, dark gray), and d concentric hypertrophy (both increased LVM and RWT, black). p value difference between groups was < 0.0001. B Prevalence of Abnormal Diastolic Function by Diabetes Type. Diastolic function was compared to data from age similar healthy controls to assess the percent of abnormal diastolic function in participants with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes [32, 33]

References

    1. Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, Imperatore G, Linder B, Divers J, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA. 2014;311(17):1778–1786. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, Divers J, Isom S, Dolan L, et al. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002–2012. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1419–1429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imperatore G, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Case D, Dabelea D, Hamman RF, et al. Projections of type 1 and type 2 diabetes burden in the US population aged <20 years through 2050: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and population growth. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35 (12): 2515–2520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirakawa Y, Ninomiya T, Kiyohara Y, Murakami Y, Saitoh S, Nakagawa H, et al. Age-specific impact of diabetes mellitus on the risk of cardiovascular mortality: an overview from the evidence for Cardiovascular Prevention from Observational Cohorts in the Japan Research Group (EPOCH-JAPAN) J Epidemiol. 2017;27(3):123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Koro CE, Ephross SA, Brown JB. The incidence of congestive heart failure in type 2 diabetes: an update. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(8):1879–1884. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1879. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms