Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;66(12):1815-1823.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.09150. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

Peak Expiratory Flow During Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation: Endotracheal Tube Versus Face Mask

Affiliations

Peak Expiratory Flow During Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation: Endotracheal Tube Versus Face Mask

Sung Eun Hyun et al. Respir Care. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) applied through the endotracheal tube (ETT) can effectively eliminate airway secretions in intubated patients. However, the effect of the interface (ETT vs face mask) on expiratory air flow generated by MI-E has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the ETT on peak expiratory flow (PEF) along with other associated factors that could influence PEF generated by MI-E.

Methods: Intubated participants received 2 sessions of MI-E via ETT therapy per d for 2 consecutive days. One MI-E session consisted of 5 sets of either constant (+40/-40 cm H2O) or incremental (+30/-30 to +50/-50 cm H2O) pressure applications. Following extubation, MI-E sessions were repeated using face mask. Expiratory air flow during MI-E therapy was continuously measured, and every PEF during each application was analyzed using linear mixed-effect and generalized linear mixed models.

Results: A total of 12 participants (9 [75.0%] men; mean [SD] age, 74.0 [10.2] y) completed all MI-E sessions with both ETT and face mask interfaces. The PEF generated during MI-E treatment was influenced by the interface (ETT vs face mask), pressure gradient, and number of session repetitions. Adjusted mean PEF values for MI-E via ETT and face mask at +40/-40 cm H2O were -2.521 and -3.114 L/s, respectively, and -2.956 and -3.364 L/s at +50/-50 cm H2O, respectively. At a pressure gradient of +40/-40 cm H2O, only 172 of 528 MI-E trials via ETT (32.6%) achieved a PEF faster than -2.7 L/s, whereas 304 of 343 MI-E trials via face mask (88.6%) exceeded PEF < -2.7 L/s.

Conclusions: MI-E via ETT generated slower PEF than via face mask, suggesting that a higher-pressure protocol should be prescribed for intubated patients. An insufflation-exsufflation pressure up to +50/-50 cm H2O could be considered to produce a PEF faster than 2.7 L/s, and the applications were safe and feasible for subjects on invasive mechanical ventilation.

Keywords: cough assist; endotracheal tube; expiratory flow; mechanical insufflation-exsufflation; mechanical ventilation; respiratory therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources