Disclosure of genetic information to family members: a systematic review of normative documents
- PMID: 34234303
- DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01248-0
Disclosure of genetic information to family members: a systematic review of normative documents
Abstract
Purpose: Findings from genomic sequencing can have important implications for patients and family members. Yet, when a patient does not consent to the disclosure of genetic information to relatives, it is unclear how health-care professionals (HCPs) should balance their responsibilities toward patients and their family members and whether breaches in confidentiality are warranted.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of normative documents to understand how HCPs should discuss and facilitate family disclosure, and what should be done in cases where the patient does not consent to disclosure.
Results: We analyzed 35 documents from advisory committees at the national, European, and international level. We identified discrepancies regarding the recommended role of HCPs in disclosure. While almost all normative documents supported the disclosure of genetic information without patient consent in limited conditions, the conditions for disclosure were often not well defined. Documents provided varying degrees of information regarding what actions HCPs must take in such situations.
Conclusion: Our findings present concerns regarding the ability of these normative documents to guide HCPs' decision making around the disclosure of genetic information to family members. Clearer guidance outlining the responsibilities and acceptability of disclosure is necessary to facilitate disclosure of genetic information to family members.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
References
-
- Hall A et al. Realising genomics in clinical practice PHG Foundation Project Team. 2014. https://www.phgfoundation.org/documents/426_1419240712.pdf . Accessed 8 November 2019.
-
- Basel D, McCarrier J. Ending a diagnostic odyssey: family education, counseling, and response to eventual diagnosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017;64:265–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2016.08.017 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Leenen CHM, Heijer M, den, van der Meer C, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME, Wagner A. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation. Fam Cancer. 2016;15:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-015-9842-8 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Forrest K, et al. To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clin Genet. 2003;64:317–26. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00142.x . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dheensa S, Lucassen A, Fenwick A. Limitations and pitfalls of using family letters to communicate genetic risk: a qualitative study with patients and healthcare professionals. J Genet Couns. 2018;27:689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0164-x . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
