Noninvasive Morphologic and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
- PMID: 34235440
- PMCID: PMC8250421
- DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021200456
Noninvasive Morphologic and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Abstract
Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with relatively high rates of morbidity and mortality, and appropriate treatment selection is important for optimizing patient outcomes. Depending on individualized risk factors, clinical presentation, and imaging findings, patients are generally stratified to optimal medical therapy anchored by antihypertensives or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Using standard anatomic imaging with CT or MRI, several high-risk features including aortic diameter, false lumen (FL) features, size of entry tears, involvement of major aortic branch vessels, or evidence of visceral malperfusion have been used to select patients likely to benefit from TEVAR. However, even with these measures, the number needed to treat for TEVAR remains, and improved risk stratification is needed. Increasingly, the relationship between FL hemodynamics and adverse aortic remodeling in TBAD has been studied, and evolving noninvasive techniques can measure numerous FL hemodynamic parameters that may improve risk stratification. In addition to summarizing the current clinical state of the art for morphologic TBAD evaluation, this review provides a detailed overview of noninvasive methods for TBAD hemodynamics characterization, including computational fluid dynamics and four-dimensional flow MRI. Keywords: CT, Image Postprocessing, MRI, Cardiac, Vascular, Aorta, Dissection © RSNA, 2021.
Keywords: Aorta; CT; Cardiac; Dissection; Image Postprocessing; MRI; Vascular.
2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: Z.A.Z. disclosed no relevant relationships. A.B. disclosed no relevant relationships. S.C.M. disclosed no relevant relationships. A.W.H. disclosed no relevant relationships. C.K.M. disclosed no relevant relationships. P.V. disclosed no relevant relationships. N.S.B. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: author’s institution receives royalties from and has patent pending with Imbio. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. A.R.A. disclosed no relevant relationships. J.D.C. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: author’s institution has an investigator-initiated grant from Siemens Healthineers, not related to this work.; author received travel funding from Siemens Healthineers to attend a research summit between Mayo Clinic CT Innovation Center and Siemens Healthineers. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. C.J.F. Activities related to the present article: author is an associate editor of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging (not involved in the handling of this article). Activities not related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. B.D.A. Activities related to the present article: author’s institution has research grant from the American Heart Association. Activities not related to the present article: author received consultancy fee from Tempus Laboratory for expert image segmentation; author has Dixon translational research grant from Northwestern University and SCMR Seed Grant from Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; author received payment from Medscape for development of educational presentations. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.
Figures
References
-
- Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 2010; 121(13):e266–e36.[Published correction appears in Circulation 2010;122(4):e410.]. - PubMed
-
- Clouse WD, Hallett JW Jr, Schaff HV, et al. Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79(2):176–180. - PubMed
-
- Crawford ES. The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. JAMA 1990; 264(19):2537–2541. - PubMed
-
- Reutersberg B, Trenner M, Haller B, Geisbüsch S, Reeps C, Eckstein HH. The incidence of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissections is underestimated. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68(2):356–363. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
