Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 24;3(3):e200456.
doi: 10.1148/ryct.2021200456. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Noninvasive Morphologic and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive Morphologic and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Zachary A Zilber et al. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. .

Abstract

Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with relatively high rates of morbidity and mortality, and appropriate treatment selection is important for optimizing patient outcomes. Depending on individualized risk factors, clinical presentation, and imaging findings, patients are generally stratified to optimal medical therapy anchored by antihypertensives or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Using standard anatomic imaging with CT or MRI, several high-risk features including aortic diameter, false lumen (FL) features, size of entry tears, involvement of major aortic branch vessels, or evidence of visceral malperfusion have been used to select patients likely to benefit from TEVAR. However, even with these measures, the number needed to treat for TEVAR remains, and improved risk stratification is needed. Increasingly, the relationship between FL hemodynamics and adverse aortic remodeling in TBAD has been studied, and evolving noninvasive techniques can measure numerous FL hemodynamic parameters that may improve risk stratification. In addition to summarizing the current clinical state of the art for morphologic TBAD evaluation, this review provides a detailed overview of noninvasive methods for TBAD hemodynamics characterization, including computational fluid dynamics and four-dimensional flow MRI. Keywords: CT, Image Postprocessing, MRI, Cardiac, Vascular, Aorta, Dissection © RSNA, 2021.

Keywords: Aorta; CT; Cardiac; Dissection; Image Postprocessing; MRI; Vascular.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: Z.A.Z. disclosed no relevant relationships. A.B. disclosed no relevant relationships. S.C.M. disclosed no relevant relationships. A.W.H. disclosed no relevant relationships. C.K.M. disclosed no relevant relationships. P.V. disclosed no relevant relationships. N.S.B. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: author’s institution receives royalties from and has patent pending with Imbio. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. A.R.A. disclosed no relevant relationships. J.D.C. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: author’s institution has an investigator-initiated grant from Siemens Healthineers, not related to this work.; author received travel funding from Siemens Healthineers to attend a research summit between Mayo Clinic CT Innovation Center and Siemens Healthineers. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. C.J.F. Activities related to the present article: author is an associate editor of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging (not involved in the handling of this article). Activities not related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. B.D.A. Activities related to the present article: author’s institution has research grant from the American Heart Association. Activities not related to the present article: author received consultancy fee from Tempus Laboratory for expert image segmentation; author has Dixon translational research grant from Northwestern University and SCMR Seed Grant from Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; author received payment from Medscape for development of educational presentations. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.

Figures

 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in the matched patients (with
uncomplicated type B aortic dissection) who were treated with TEVAR or BMT. The
differences between the two groups were assessed with log-rank test. (A) Freedom
from all-cause death between the two groups. Freedom from all-cause death in the
TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (P = .028). (B)
Freedom from aortic-related death between the two groups. Freedom from
aortic-related death in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of
the BMT group (P = .044). (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 11).
Note that best medical treatment (BMT) terminology is equivalent to optimal
medical therapy. TEVAR = thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
Figure 1:
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in the matched patients (with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection) who were treated with TEVAR or BMT. The differences between the two groups were assessed with log-rank test. (A) Freedom from all-cause death between the two groups. Freedom from all-cause death in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (P = .028). (B) Freedom from aortic-related death between the two groups. Freedom from aortic-related death in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (P = .044). (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 11). Note that best medical treatment (BMT) terminology is equivalent to optimal medical therapy. TEVAR = thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
(A–D) Images from standard CT evaluation of rTAAD show multiple
planar reformatted imaging with (D) double oblique measurement of descending
aorta diameter. This patient has repaired TAAD and a large fenestration
between the true lumen (TL) and the false lumen (FL) in the proximal aortic
arch (red arrow). rTAAD = residual type B aortic dissection following repair
of type A aortic dissection.
Figure 2:
(A–D) Images from standard CT evaluation of rTAAD show multiple planar reformatted imaging with (D) double oblique measurement of descending aorta diameter. This patient has repaired TAAD and a large fenestration between the true lumen (TL) and the false lumen (FL) in the proximal aortic arch (red arrow). rTAAD = residual type B aortic dissection following repair of type A aortic dissection.
Representative MR angiographic image of a type B aortic dissection in
cross section utilizing a respiratory navigator–gated, T2-prepared
balanced steady-state free precession sequence. In this patient, the false
lumen (FL) circumferential extent is approximately 215° of the total
circumference of the aorta. According to Sailer et al, an FL angular extent
greater than 249° is considered a high-risk feature predictive of
adverse events (20). TL = true lumen.
Figure 3:
Representative MR angiographic image of a type B aortic dissection in cross section utilizing a respiratory navigator–gated, T2-prepared balanced steady-state free precession sequence. In this patient, the false lumen (FL) circumferential extent is approximately 215° of the total circumference of the aorta. According to Sailer et al, an FL angular extent greater than 249° is considered a high-risk feature predictive of adverse events (20). TL = true lumen.
Boxplot shows the spatial variation and mean values of lumen pressure
difference between the false lumen (FL) and the true lumen (TL) of an ex vivo
porcine model after propagation with and without distal re-entry tear. Mean
values are represented by diamond symbol within the boxplot. (Reprinted, under a
CC BY license, from reference 26).
Figure 4:
Boxplot shows the spatial variation and mean values of lumen pressure difference between the false lumen (FL) and the true lumen (TL) of an ex vivo porcine model after propagation with and without distal re-entry tear. Mean values are represented by diamond symbol within the boxplot. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 26).
 Left: Patient-specific TBAD reconstructed from CT image. Right: TAWSS
shows areas of high wall shear stress proximally at entry tear (right).
(Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 27). TAWSS = time-averaged
wall shear stress, TBAD = type B aortic dissection.
Figure 5:
Left: Patient-specific TBAD reconstructed from CT image. Right: TAWSS shows areas of high wall shear stress proximally at entry tear (right). (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 27). TAWSS = time-averaged wall shear stress, TBAD = type B aortic dissection.
Images in a 69-year-old man with repaired type A aortic dissection.
Color-coded streamline visualizations during (A) midsystole, (B) late
systole, and (C) early diastole show the differences in flow patterns in the
TL (solid arrow) and FL. Open arrow indicates a local region of flow
acceleration. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 37). FL =
false lumen, TL = true lumen.
Figure 6:
Images in a 69-year-old man with repaired type A aortic dissection. Color-coded streamline visualizations during (A) midsystole, (B) late systole, and (C) early diastole show the differences in flow patterns in the TL (solid arrow) and FL. Open arrow indicates a local region of flow acceleration. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 37). FL = false lumen, TL = true lumen.
Blood flow rate per aortic lumen area (mL/s/cm2) curves standardized by
one cardiac cycle. (A–D) Control participants. (E–H) TL of
patients with CDTAD. (I–K) FL of patients with CDTAD. * = P
< .01 versus control (peak systole), † = P < .05 versus
control (peak systole), ‡ = P < .05 versus CDTAD TL (peak
systole). (Reprinted, with permission, from reference 39). CTDAD = chronic
descending thoracic aortic dissection, FL = false lumen, TL = true
lumen.
Figure 7:
Blood flow rate per aortic lumen area (mL/s/cm2) curves standardized by one cardiac cycle. (A–D) Control participants. (E–H) TL of patients with CDTAD. (I–K) FL of patients with CDTAD. * = P < .01 versus control (peak systole), † = P < .05 versus control (peak systole), ‡ = P < .05 versus CDTAD TL (peak systole). (Reprinted, with permission, from reference 39). CTDAD = chronic descending thoracic aortic dissection, FL = false lumen, TL = true lumen.
 Forward flow, reverse flow, kinetic energy (KE), and stasis maps in three
example subjects. Top row: A 55-year-old medically managed patient with TBAD;
middle row: a 63-year-old patient with rTAAD after open AAo replacement with
aortic valve replacement; and bottom row: a 54-year-old control. Arrows show
regions of elevated forward flow, reverse flow, and KE (patient with AAo
repair), as well as elevated stasis (patient with TBAD). (Reprinted, under a CC
BY license, from reference 42). AAo = ascending aorta, rTAAD = residual type B
aortic dissection following repair of type A aortic dissection, TBAD = type B
aortic dissection.
Figure 8:
Forward flow, reverse flow, kinetic energy (KE), and stasis maps in three example subjects. Top row: A 55-year-old medically managed patient with TBAD; middle row: a 63-year-old patient with rTAAD after open AAo replacement with aortic valve replacement; and bottom row: a 54-year-old control. Arrows show regions of elevated forward flow, reverse flow, and KE (patient with AAo repair), as well as elevated stasis (patient with TBAD). (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 42). AAo = ascending aorta, rTAAD = residual type B aortic dissection following repair of type A aortic dissection, TBAD = type B aortic dissection.
Hemodynamic characterization of the FL in patients with TBAD. Boxplot is
shown with red line = median, large box = interquartile range, 25%–75% of
data. Each data point represents the average ROI value for one subject along the
FL (for patients) or entire aorta (for controls). * = P < .05,
** = P< .001. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from
reference 42). Red + indicates outliers, values that fall below the
boxplot-defined minimum and above the maximum. AAo Repair = repaired type A
(ascending aorta [AAo]) aortic dissection, ET = open elephant trunk repair, FL =
false lumen, KE = kinetic energy, ROI = region of interest, TBAD = type B aortic
dissection.
Figure 9:
Hemodynamic characterization of the FL in patients with TBAD. Boxplot is shown with red line = median, large box = interquartile range, 25%–75% of data. Each data point represents the average ROI value for one subject along the FL (for patients) or entire aorta (for controls). * = P < .05, ** = P< .001. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 42). Red + indicates outliers, values that fall below the boxplot-defined minimum and above the maximum. AAo Repair = repaired type A (ascending aorta [AAo]) aortic dissection, ET = open elephant trunk repair, FL = false lumen, KE = kinetic energy, ROI = region of interest, TBAD = type B aortic dissection.
Four-dimensional (4D) flow hemodynamic assessment. (A) The FL EF was
measured in the plane of the dominant entry tear and was defined as the
proportion of retrograde flow (L/min) exiting the FL during diastole over the
systolic antegrade flow volume (L/min) at the dominant entry tear. (B)
Three-dimensional visualization of 4D flow MRI data in a patient with TBAD
demonstrating the flow analysis plane for the entry tear FL EF measurement (red
line) and the TL and FL analysis planes (gray line) measured 3 cm distal to the
tear. Antegrade flow is depicted in the TL and FL during systole (black arrow),
with retrograde flow being “ejected” from the FL during diastole
(yellow arrow) in a representative case with measured FL EF of 49%. (Reprinted,
under a CC BY license, from reference 44). FL EF = false lumen ejection
fraction, LSC = left subclavian artery, TBAD = type B aortic dissection, TL =
true lumen.
Figure 10:
Four-dimensional (4D) flow hemodynamic assessment. (A) The FL EF was measured in the plane of the dominant entry tear and was defined as the proportion of retrograde flow (L/min) exiting the FL during diastole over the systolic antegrade flow volume (L/min) at the dominant entry tear. (B) Three-dimensional visualization of 4D flow MRI data in a patient with TBAD demonstrating the flow analysis plane for the entry tear FL EF measurement (red line) and the TL and FL analysis planes (gray line) measured 3 cm distal to the tear. Antegrade flow is depicted in the TL and FL during systole (black arrow), with retrograde flow being “ejected” from the FL during diastole (yellow arrow) in a representative case with measured FL EF of 49%. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 44). FL EF = false lumen ejection fraction, LSC = left subclavian artery, TBAD = type B aortic dissection, TL = true lumen.
Scatterplots demonstrate the correlations between aortic growth rate and
(A) baseline maximal aortic diameter, (B) false lumen ejection fraction, (C)
dominant entry tear size, and (D) distance from the LSC to the entry tear.
(Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 44). LSC = left subclavian
artery.
Figure 11:
Scatterplots demonstrate the correlations between aortic growth rate and (A) baseline maximal aortic diameter, (B) false lumen ejection fraction, (C) dominant entry tear size, and (D) distance from the LSC to the entry tear. (Reprinted, under a CC BY license, from reference 44). LSC = left subclavian artery.
(A) CTA, (B) 4D flow MRI velocity MIP overlaid on magnitude images in an
oblique sagittal view, and (C) CEMRA. The CTA and MRA clearly demonstrate
dissection anatomy (TL [yellow arrows] and FL), however, both are often limited
by blurring artifact related to pulsatile flap motion. The 4D flow velocity MIP
reveals four discrete fenestrations from their associated flow jets into the FL
during systole (white arrows). (Reprinted, under CC BY 4.0 license, from
reference 49). AAo = ascending aorta, CEMRA = contrast material–enhanced
MR angiogram, CTA = CT angiogram, DAo = descending aorta, FL = false lumen, MIP
= maximum intensity projection, TL = true lumen, 4D = four
dimensional.
Figure 12:
(A) CTA, (B) 4D flow MRI velocity MIP overlaid on magnitude images in an oblique sagittal view, and (C) CEMRA. The CTA and MRA clearly demonstrate dissection anatomy (TL [yellow arrows] and FL), however, both are often limited by blurring artifact related to pulsatile flap motion. The 4D flow velocity MIP reveals four discrete fenestrations from their associated flow jets into the FL during systole (white arrows). (Reprinted, under CC BY 4.0 license, from reference 49). AAo = ascending aorta, CEMRA = contrast material–enhanced MR angiogram, CTA = CT angiogram, DAo = descending aorta, FL = false lumen, MIP = maximum intensity projection, TL = true lumen, 4D = four dimensional.
(A) Image from CEMRA demonstrates a complex type B dissection. (B) Image
from 4D flow MRI velocity MIP during systole reveals several large, relatively
high-velocity jets entering an aneurysmal segment of the false lumen (*)
at the proximal DAo (white arrows) and impinging on the false lumen wall. (C) In
diastole, there is retrograde flow into the true lumen at these sites (white
arrows), with an additional fenestration in the distal DAo seen only due to
diastolic flow (red arrow). This fenestration was not seen at CT. (Reprinted,
with permission, from reference 49). AAo = ascending aorta, CEMRA = contrast
material–enhanced MR angiogram, DAo = descending aorta, MIP = maximum
intensity projection, 4D = four dimensional.
Figure 13:
(A) Image from CEMRA demonstrates a complex type B dissection. (B) Image from 4D flow MRI velocity MIP during systole reveals several large, relatively high-velocity jets entering an aneurysmal segment of the false lumen (*) at the proximal DAo (white arrows) and impinging on the false lumen wall. (C) In diastole, there is retrograde flow into the true lumen at these sites (white arrows), with an additional fenestration in the distal DAo seen only due to diastolic flow (red arrow). This fenestration was not seen at CT. (Reprinted, with permission, from reference 49). AAo = ascending aorta, CEMRA = contrast material–enhanced MR angiogram, DAo = descending aorta, MIP = maximum intensity projection, 4D = four dimensional.

References

    1. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 2010; 121(13):e266–e36.[Published correction appears in Circulation 2010;122(4):e410.]. - PubMed
    1. Clouse WD, Hallett JW Jr, Schaff HV, et al. Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79(2):176–180. - PubMed
    1. Afifi RO, Sandhu HK, Leake SS, et al. Outcomes of patients with acute type B (DeBakey III) aortic dissection: a 13-year, single-center experience. Circulation 2015; 132(8):748–754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crawford ES. The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. JAMA 1990; 264(19):2537–2541. - PubMed
    1. Reutersberg B, Trenner M, Haller B, Geisbüsch S, Reeps C, Eckstein HH. The incidence of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissections is underestimated. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68(2):356–363. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources