Functional Outcome of Patients Undergoing Knee Arthrodesis after Infected Total Arthroplasty
- PMID: 34239196
- PMCID: PMC8249054
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709198
Functional Outcome of Patients Undergoing Knee Arthrodesis after Infected Total Arthroplasty
Abstract
Objective Retrospectively assess the functional outcome of patients undergoing arthrodesis after septic failure of total knee arthroplasty. Methods Eighteen patients were evaluated, with a mean time of 3.7 years of follow-up. Arthrodesis surgery was performed using a narrow anterior dynamic compression plate, and medial or external fixator in two planes of the joint (Orthofix Bone Growth Therapy, Lewisville, TS, USA), at the surgeon's discretion. Results The most frequent pathogen found was Staphylococcus aureus methicillin sensitive (38.9%). The mean lower limb discrepancy was 3.63 cm. The mean knee society score was 68 points. According to the visual analog scale for pain, 44% of the patients had a 0 score at the time of assessment, and 22.2% were very dissatisfied, despite the bone healing achieved. Patients were assessed for the ability to walk with or without assistance. Conclusion Knee arthrodesis surgery was effective in controlling the infectious process and decreasing pain complaints, but satisfaction with the procedure was low.
Keywords: arthrodesis; arthroplasty, replacement, knee; infection; knee.
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflito de Interesses Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Knee arthrodesis with a double mono-bar external fixators to salvage infected knee arthroplasty: retrospective analysis of 18 knees with mean seven-year follow-up].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 Jun;93(4):373-80. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90279-2. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007. PMID: 17646819 French.
-
Outcome after knee arthrodesis for failed septic total knee replacement using a monolateral external fixator.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Dec;21(3):275-80. doi: 10.1177/230949901302100302. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013. PMID: 24366783
-
Knee arthrodesis using a custom modular intramedullary nail in failed, infected knee arthroplasties: A concise follow-up note of 31 cases at a median of 13 years post-arthrodesis.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Jun;107(4):102898. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102898. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33774190
-
Advanced concepts in knee arthrodesis.World J Orthop. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):202-10. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.202. eCollection 2015 Mar 18. World J Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25793160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Re-infection rates and clinical outcomes following arthrodesis with intramedullary nail and external fixator for infected knee prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2283-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30301462 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Knee Arthrodesis for Periprosthetic Knee Infection: Fusion Rate, Complications, and Limb Salvage-A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;12(7):804. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070804. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38610226 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comparison of outcomes for above-knee-amputation and arthrodesis for the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2933-2941. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03507-z. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 36912949
References
-
- Kuzyk P R, Dhotar H S, Sternheim A, Gross A E, Safir O, Backstein D. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection: techniques, controversies, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(03):153–164. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources