Pedicled Chimeric Perforator Flap Based on Inferior Gluteal Vessel Axis for the Reconstruction of Stage-Four Primary Ischial Pressure Sores-A New Design
- PMID: 34239241
- PMCID: PMC8257320
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729505
Pedicled Chimeric Perforator Flap Based on Inferior Gluteal Vessel Axis for the Reconstruction of Stage-Four Primary Ischial Pressure Sores-A New Design
Abstract
Background "Subfascial void reconstruction" in ischial pressure sores (IPSs) goes a long way in the amelioration of the common complications like persistent drainage, infection, wound dehiscence, and late recurrence. No locoregional flaps suffice this requirement. So we have designed a chimeric pedicled flap based on the inferior gluteal vessel axis (IGVA) perforators with two tissue components: (1) Pacman-style fasciocutaneous flap on a perforator and (2) gluteus maximus muscle (inferior portion) on another independent perforator. Aim and Methods After confirming the feasibility of novel design of chimeric pedicled IGVA perforator flap with cadaver study, we embarked on the clinical study with this chimeric flap. In this prospective cohort study, the study and the control existed in the same patient so that the biological factors affecting the wound healing would be the same. Results Twenty-one patients were included whose mean age was 39 years. Late recurrence occurred in one patient (4.8%) of chimeric flap while the control group (who had undergone conventional reconstruction) had recurrence in 11 patients (52.4%). On assessment with overall institutional score, grade A was observed in 18 patients of the chimeric IGVA flap group ( p < 0.045), and in only 3 patients of the control group. Conclusions This anatomically construed flap, a new addendum in the armamentarium of reconstruction of IPSs, with its potential to congruently fill the ischiogluteal subfascial void may provide a lasting solution for preventing recurrences.
Keywords: chimeric inferior gluteal artery perforator flap; ischial pressure ulcer; myelopathic patients; recurrent pressure ulcer.
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestFinancial Support and Sponsorship None declared. None.
Figures
References
-
- National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance In: Haesler E, ed. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Osborne Park, Australia: Cambridge Media2014
-
- Dansereau J G, Conway H. Closure of decubiti in paraplegic. Report of 2000 Cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964;33:474–480. - PubMed
-
- Kwon R, Janis J E. Pressure sores. In: Neligan PC, ed. Plastic Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier. 2018:351–382.
-
- Chen Y, Devivo M J, Jackson A B. Pressure ulcer prevalence in people with spinal cord injury: age-period-duration effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(06):1208–1213. - PubMed
-
- Cushing C A, Phillips L G. Evidence-based medicine: pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(06):1720–1732. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
