Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 2:14:2797-2801.
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306124. eCollection 2021.

Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan

Affiliations

Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan

Amer Mahmoud Sindiani et al. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. .

Abstract

Purpose: To find out whether couples with predominant female offspring have more chances to produce more female embryos during non-medical pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for male sex selection.

Methods: A total of 125 couples who had three or more female offspring and underwent non-medical PGD for male sex selection between 2015 and 2019 were included. Nuclear DNA was analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Two-chromosome (X, Y), 3-chromosome (21, X, Y), and 5-chromosome (13, 18, 21, X, Y) probes were used for FISH. The standard protocol was followed for sperm processing and embryo culture for IVF and PGD.

Results: In 83.2% of the couples, the ratio of female embryos was higher than male embryos. Independent sample t-test showed that there is no significant difference between equal and unequal embryonic groups in patients' age, husbands' age, sperm count, sperm motility, total male embryos, total female embryos, normal male embryos, and normal female embryos. For patients with positive pregnancy outcome, 84.6% had unequal embryonic ratio while 15.4% had equal embryonic ratio. Similarly, patients who were treated by short protocol had 85% of unequal embryonic ratio and 15% had equal ratio.

Conclusion: A greater variability in the female to male embryonic ratio is produced in couples having predominantly female offspring and seeking non-medical PGD for male sex selection.

Keywords: IVF; PGD; embryos; infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors.

References

    1. Handyside A, Konotogianni EH, Hardy K, et al. Pregnancies from biopsied human pre-implantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplify-cation. Nature. 1990;344:768–770. doi:10.1038/344768a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirshenbaum M, Feldman B, Aizer A, et al. Preimplantation embryos sex ratios in couples with four or more children of same sex, what should be expected from a preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycle? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(6):515–517. doi:10.1080/09513590.2018.1563886 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Werlin L, Rodi I, DeCherney A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(2):467–468. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00605-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society PGDIS. Guidelines for good practice in PGD: programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance. Reprod Biomed. 2008;16(1):134–147. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60567-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilton L, Thornhill A, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(5):1221–1228. doi:10.1093/humrep/den488 - DOI - PubMed