Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253911.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253911. eCollection 2021.

When research is me-search: How researchers' motivation to pursue a topic affects laypeople's trust in science

Affiliations
Observational Study

When research is me-search: How researchers' motivation to pursue a topic affects laypeople's trust in science

Marlene Sophie Altenmüller et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Research is often fueled by researchers' scientific, but also their personal interests: Sometimes, researchers decide to pursue a specific research question because the answer to that question is idiosyncratically relevant for themselves: Such "me-search" may not only affect the quality of research, but also how it is perceived by the general public. In two studies (N = 621), we investigate the circumstances under which learning about a researcher's "me-search" increases or decreases laypeople's ascriptions of trustworthiness and credibility to the respective researcher. Results suggest that participants' own preexisting attitudes towards the research topic moderate the effects of "me-search" substantially: When participants hold favorable attitudes towards the research topic (i.e., LGBTQ or veganism), "me-searchers" were perceived as more trustworthy and their research was perceived as more credible. This pattern was reversed when participants held unfavorable attitudes towards the research topic. Study 2 furthermore shows that trustworthiness and credibility perceptions generalize to evaluations of the entire field of research. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Linear regression plots for the interaction effect of attitudes × condition on epistemic trustworthiness (Fig 1A) and credibility (Fig 1B) with 95% confidence intervals: Participants’ attitudes towards the research topic moderated how a researcher’s disclosure of being personally affected (vs. being not personally affected) by one’s own research was perceived.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Linear regression plots for the interaction effect of attitudes × condition on epistemic trustworthiness (Fig 2A), credibility (Fig 2B) and critical evaluation of the entire field (Fig 2C) with 95% confidence intervals: Participants’ attitudes towards the research topic moderated how a researcher’s disclosure of being personally affected (vs. being not personally affected) by one’s own research was perceived.

References

    1. Hu JC. Studying the science of science. Science | AAAS; [Internet]. 2016. Mar 23 [cited 2020 Sep 7]; Available from: https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/03/studying-science-science
    1. Keesing RG. The history of Newton’s apple tree. Contemporary Physics. 1998. Sep;39(5):377–91.
    1. Taylor JB. My Stroke of Insight. Hachette; UK; 2009. 140 p.
    1. Kaufman L. A Superhighway to Bliss. The New York Times [Internet]. 2008 May 25 [cited 2020 Oct 28]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/fashion/25brain.html
    1. Klitzman R. Myths About Our Right and Left Brains. Psychology Today [Internet]. 2013. Jan 7 [cited 2020 Oct 28]; Available from: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/am-i-my-genes/201301/myths-about-our...

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources