Reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of single and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
- PMID: 34244874
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04056-y
Reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of single and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Abstract
Introduction: The purposes of this study were to identify the 2 year rate of reoperation and determine patient-reported outcomes after elective one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft and anterior plating using indications similar to cervical disc arthroplasty.
Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 116 consecutive one- and two-level primary ACDF for adult degenerative disease with structural allograft and anterior plating in one surgeon's practice. Patient-reported visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and radiographs, collected prospectively on all operative patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were reviewed. Patient demographics and reoperation rates were obtained from the chart.
Results: One hundred and four patients were identified with a final reoperation rate of 2.9% at a mean final follow-up 2 years (95% CI 17.2-29.0). No reoperations occurred within 90 days. After 1 year, three patients required reoperation. The mean patient-reported outcomes improved (VAS, 6.6 preoperatively to 3.0 at final follow-up and ODI, 24.3 preoperatively to 12.3 at final follow-up). These improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.01). No significant patient risk factors for reoperation were found.
Conclusions: The rate of reoperation for one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at follow-up was found to be lower than those previously published in the literature quoted for CDA. Arthrodesis continues to demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
Keywords: ACDF; Anterior cervical discectomy fusion; Outcome; Reoperation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Buttermann GR (2018) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 years: a prospective study. Spine 43(3):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002273 (Phila Pa 1976) - DOI
-
- Andresen AK, Paulsen RT, Busch F, Isenberg-Jørgensen A, Carreon LY, Andersen M (2018) Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction after surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Global Spine J 8(7):703–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218765398 - DOI
-
- Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000031261.66972.B1 (Phila Pa 1976) - DOI
-
- Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81(4):519–528. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009 - DOI
-
- Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC (2010) Biomechanical comparison of single-and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J 10(4):341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources