Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 9;27(4):47.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00322-9.

Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study

Affiliations
Review

Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study

Krishma Labib et al. Sci Eng Ethics. .

Abstract

To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers' behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three round Delphi survey study to explore which RI topics to address in institutional RI policies by seeking consensus from research policy experts and institutional leaders. A total of 68 RPO and 52 RFO experts, representing different disciplines, countries and genders, completed one, two or all rounds of the study. There was consensus among the experts on the importance of 12 RI topics for RPOs and 11 for RFOs. The topics that ranked highest for RPOs concerned education and training, supervision and mentoring, dealing with RI breaches, and supporting a responsible research process (e.g. through quality assurance). The highest ranked RFO topics concerned dealing with breaches of RI, conflicts of interest, and setting expectations on RPOs (e.g. about educating researchers about RI). Together with the research policy experts and institutional leaders, we developed a comprehensive overview of topics important for inclusion in the RI policies of RPOs and RFOs. The topics reflect preference for a preventative approach to RI, coupled with procedures for dealing with RI breaches. RPOs and RFOs should address each of these topics in order to support researchers in conducting responsible research.

Keywords: Institutional policies; Research funding organizations; Research integrity; Research integrity policy; Research performing organizations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Delphi procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Agreement on importance of RI topics. The x-axis represents the topics that were presented to the experts. The bars in blue indicate the RPO topics, whereas the bars in green indicate the RFO topics. The y-axis represents the percentage of experts who rated each topic 4–5 on importance on the 5 point Likert scale (i.e. very important-absolutely essential). The black dotted line shows the consensus cut-off value of 67% agreement

References

    1. All European Academies (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity, revised edition. Berlin.
    1. Boehme, O., Föger, N., Hiney, M., Peatfiled, T., & Petiet, F. (2016). Research integrity practices in science Europe member organisations. Science Europe, July.
    1. Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PloS one, 6(6). 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouter L. What research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2020;26(4):2363–2369. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00178-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouter LM. Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;96:143–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources