Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;49(9):2566-2578.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02827-7. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

Evaluation of the LeukoScope for Point-of-Care Measurement of White Blood Cell and Neutrophil Counts in Malawi

Affiliations

Evaluation of the LeukoScope for Point-of-Care Measurement of White Blood Cell and Neutrophil Counts in Malawi

Catherine E Majors et al. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

White blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts are important laboratory tests used by clinicians to assess a variety of conditions. However, current methods to measure WBC and neutrophil counts are difficult to perform at the point of care, being either cost or labor prohibitive. To meet this need, we developed the LeukoScope: a portable, imaging-based system to measure WBC and neutrophil counts from a drop of blood. Here, we present the performance of the LeukoScope in 136 pediatric and 164 neonatal subjects at a central hospital in Malawi. For pediatric patients, 95.4, 66.7, and 80.0% of samples with normal, low, and high WBC counts, respectively, were correctly identified, and 88.6, 100.0, and 89.3% of samples with normal, low, and high neutrophil counts, respectively, were correctly identified. Accuracy was lower overall for neonatal samples; 92.1, 64.3, and 26.7% of samples with normal, low, and high WBC counts, respectively, were correctly identified, and 73.2 and 78.6% of samples with normal and high neutrophil counts, respectively, were correctly identified. Results of this study show that the LeukoScope can help meet need for point-of-care measurement of WBC counts in pediatric patients and highlight the challenges of point-of-care assessment of WBC counts in neonatal patients.

Keywords: Infection management; Low-resource settings; Neonatal; Neutrophil count; Pediatric; White blood cell count.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310, 1986. - DOI
    1. Bond, M. M., and R. R. Richards-Kortum. Drop-to-drop variation in the cellular components of fingerprick blood implications for point-of-care diagnostic development. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 144:885–894, 2015. - DOI
    1. Bui, H. N., J. P. A. M. Bogers, D. Cohen, T. Njo, and M. H. Herruer. Evaluation of the performance of a point-of-care method for total and differential white blood cell count in clozapine users. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 38:703–709, 2016. - DOI
    1. Houwen, B. The differential cell count. Lab. Hematol. 7:89–100, 2001.
    1. Karawajczyk, M., S. Haile, M. Grabski, and A. Larsson. The HemoCue WBC DIFF system could be used for leucocyte and neutrophil counts but not for full differential counts. Acta Paediatr. 106:974–978, 2017. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources