Why 2 Studies That Used the Same Probiotic May Have Come Up With Different Outcomes
- PMID: 34245249
- PMCID: PMC8906753
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab618
Why 2 Studies That Used the Same Probiotic May Have Come Up With Different Outcomes
Comment in
-
Reply to McFarland et al.Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 9;74(5):942-943. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab619. Clin Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 34240136 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Enhanced Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention With a Pharmacy-Controlled Policy That Adds a 3-Strain Lactobacillus Probiotic Concomitantly to Antibiotic Therapy.Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;73(8):1524-1527. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab414. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33966076 Free PMC article.
-
A Multicenter Evaluation of Probiotic Use for the Primary Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection.Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;73(8):1330-1337. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab417. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33972996
References
-
- Heil EL, Harris AD, Brown C, A multi-center evaluation of probiotic use for the primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:1330–7. - PubMed
-
- McFarland LV, Johnson S, Evans C. Perils and pitfalls of probiotic quasi-experimental studies for primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infections: a review of the evidence. Am J Infect Control 2021; 49:375–84. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources