Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):1371.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11425-0.

Effectiveness of a community-level social mobilization intervention in achieving the outcomes of polio vaccination campaigns during the post-polio-endemic period: Evidence from CORE Group polio project in Uttar Pradesh, India

Affiliations

Effectiveness of a community-level social mobilization intervention in achieving the outcomes of polio vaccination campaigns during the post-polio-endemic period: Evidence from CORE Group polio project in Uttar Pradesh, India

Manojkumar Choudhary et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: A social mobilization (SM) initiative contributed to India's success in polio elimination. This was the CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) India, a partner of the Uttar Pradesh (UP) SM Network and which continued its SM activities, even during the polio-free period through a network of multi-level social mobilizers. This paper assesses the effects of this community-level SM (CLSM) intervention on the extent of community engagement and performance of polio Supplementary Immunization Activity campaigns (SIAs) during the post-polio-endemic period (i.e., from March 2012 to September 2017).

Methods: This study followed a quasi-experimental design. We used secondary, cluster-level data from CGPP India's Management Information System, including 52 SIAs held from January 2008 to September 2017, covering 56 blocks from 12 districts of UP. We computed various indicators and performed Generalized Estimating Equations based analysis to assess the statistical significance of differences between the outcomes of intervention and non-intervention areas. We then estimated the effects of the SM intervention using Interrupted time-series, Difference-in-Differences and Synthetic Control Methods. Finally, we estimated the population influenced by the intervention.

Results: The performance of polio SIAs changed over time, with the intervention areas having better outcomes than non-intervention areas. The absence of CLSM intervention during the post-polio-endemic period would have negatively impacted the outcomes of polio SIAs. The percentage of children vaccinated at polio SIA booths, percentage of 'X' houses (i.e., households with unvaccinated children or households with out-of-home/out-of-village children or locked households) converted to 'P' (i.e., households with all vaccinated children or households without children eligible for vaccination), and percentage of resistant houses converted to polio acceptors would have gone down by 14.1 (Range: 12.7 to 15.5), 6.3 (Range: 5.2 to 7.3) and 7.4 percentage points, respectively. Community engagement would have reduced by 7.2 (Range: 6.6 to 7.7) percentage points.

Conclusions: The absence of CLSM intervention would have significantly decreased the level of community engagement and negatively impacted the performance of polio SIAs of the post-polio-endemic period. The study provides evidence of an added value of deploying additional human resource dedicated to social mobilization to achieve desired vaccination outcomes in hard-to-reach or programmatically challenging areas.

Keywords: CORE Group polio project; Polio; Social mobilization; Supplementary immunization activities; Vaccination campaigns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The first four authors received consultancy fees from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) to support CGPP’s interventions in India. The last two authors did not receive any financial support and do not have any competing interests in the project described.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trends in performance indicators and CEI of polio SIAs by Intervention Status, January 2008 to September 2017. Each line represents the mean value for each indicator. The mean value is calculated at the block level separately for CMC areas (Intervention areas) and non-CMC areas (Non-intervention areas). The blue line and broken brown line represents the intervention and non-intervention areas, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Independent Monitoring Board of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The New Normal - Finding the path back to eradication in the time of coronavirus: Eighteenth Report, July 2020. 2020. http://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/20200816-IMB-18th.... Accessed 4 September 2020.
    1. WHO. Two out of three wild poliovirus strains eradicated. 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/two-out-of-three-wi.... Accessed 25 October 2019.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Global Health - Polio - Our Progress. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm. Accessed 4 March 2018.
    1. WHeO. AFP/polio data, 2e020. 2021. https://extranet.who.int/polis/public/CaseCount.aspx. Accessed 5 May 2021.
    1. Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Transition planning – GPEI. 2018. http://polioeradication.org/polio-today/preparing-for-a-polio-free-world.... Accessed 3 March 2018.

Publication types

Grants and funding