Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 23:12:620847.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.620847. eCollection 2021.

Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle

Affiliations

Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle

Fernando Flores Cardoso et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Ticks cause substantial production losses for beef and dairy cattle. Cattle resistance to ticks is one of the most important factors affecting tick control, but largely neglected due to the challenge of phenotyping. In this study, we evaluate the pooling of tick resistance phenotyped reference populations from multi-country beef cattle breeds to assess the possibility of improving host resistance through multi-trait genomic selection. Data consisted of tick counts or scores assessing the number of female ticks at least 4.5 mm length and derived from seven populations, with breed, country, number of records and genotyped/phenotyped animals being respectively: Angus (AN), Brazil, 2,263, 921/1,156, Hereford (HH), Brazil, 6,615, 1,910/2,802, Brangus (BN), Brazil, 2,441, 851/851, Braford (BO), Brazil, 9,523, 3,062/4,095, Tropical Composite (TC), Australia, 229, 229/229, Brahman (BR), Australia, 675, 675/675, and Nguni (NG), South Africa, 490, 490/490. All populations were genotyped using medium density Illumina SNP BeadChips and imputed to a common high-density panel of 332,468 markers. The mean linkage disequilibrium (LD) between adjacent SNPs varied from 0.24 to 0.37 across populations and so was sufficient to allow genomic breeding values (GEBV) prediction. Correlations of LD phase between breeds were higher between composites and their founder breeds (0.81 to 0.95) and lower between NG and the other breeds (0.27 and 0.35). There was wide range of estimated heritability (0.05 and 0.42) and genetic correlation (-0.01 and 0.87) for tick resistance across the studied populations, with the largest genetic correlation observed between BN and BO. Predictive ability was improved under the old-young validation for three of the seven populations using a multi-trait approach compared to a single trait within-population prediction, while whole and partial data GEBV correlations increased in all cases, with relative improvements ranging from 3% for BO to 64% for TC. Moreover, the multi-trait analysis was useful to correct typical over-dispersion of the GEBV. Results from this study indicate that a joint genomic evaluation of AN, HH, BN, BO and BR can be readily implemented to improve tick resistance of these populations using selection on GEBV. For NG and TC additional phenotyping will be required to obtain accurate GEBV.

Keywords: beef cattle; genomic selection; host resistance; ticks; tropical adaptation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dispersion of individuals according to the first and second principal components of the G matrix, colored by breed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heatmap of linkage disequilibrium (r2) between adjacent markers of the 332k SNP panel by breed and chromosome.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heatmap of correlation of phase between adjacent markers among breeds and chromosomes (332k panel by chromosome).

References

    1. Lew-Tabor AE, Rodriguez Valle M. A Review of Reverse Vaccinology Approaches for the Development of Vaccines Against Ticks and Tick Borne Diseases. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2016) 7:573–85. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.12.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frisch JE. Towards a Permanent Solution for Controlling Cattle Ticks. Int J Parasitol (1999) 29:57–71. 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00177-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mapholi NO, Maiwashe A, Matika O, Riggio V, Bishop SC, MacNeil MD, et al. . Genome-Wide Association Study of Tick Resistance in South African Nguni Cattle. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2016) 7:487–97. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso FF, Gomes CC, Sollero BP, Oliveira MM, Roso VM, Piccoli ML, et al. . Genomic Prediction for Tick Resistance in Braford and Hereford Cattle. J Anim Sci (2015) 93:2693–705. 10.2527/jas.2014-8832 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Porto Neto LR, Jonsson NN, D’Occhio MJ, Barendse W. Molecular Genetic Approaches for Identifying the Basis of Variation in Resistance to Tick Infestation in Cattle. Vet Parasitol (2011) 180:165–72. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.048 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types