Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;11(3):64.
doi: 10.1007/s13194-021-00381-6. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

On the mitigation of inductive risk

Affiliations

On the mitigation of inductive risk

Gabriele Contessa. Eur J Philos Sci. 2021.

Abstract

The last couple of decades have witnessed a renewed interest in the notion of inductive risk among philosophers of science. However, while it is possible to find a number of suggestions about the mitigation of inductive risk (i.e., its assessment and management) in the literature, so far these suggestions have been mostly relegated to vague marginal remarks. This paper aims to lay the groundwork for a more systematic discussion of the mitigation of inductive risk. In particular, I consider two approaches to the mitigation of inductive risk-the individualistic approach, which maintains that individual scientists are primarily responsible for the mitigation of inductive risk, and the socialized approach, according to which the responsibility for the mitigation of inductive risk should be more broadly distributed across the scientific community or, even more broadly, across society. I review some of the argument for and against the two approaches and introduce two new problems for the individualistic approach, which I call the problem of precautionary cascades and the problem of exogenous inductive risk, and I argue that a socialized approach might alleviate each of these problems.

Keywords: Inductive risk; Exogenous inductive risk; Mitigation of inductive risk; Precautionary cascades.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe author has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

    1. Avery C, Bossert W, Clark A, Ellison G, Ellison SF. An Economist’s guide to epidemiology models of infectious disease. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020;34(4):79–104. doi: 10.1257/jep.34.4.79. - DOI
    1. Biddle, J. B., & Kukla, R. (2017). The geography of epistemic risk. In K. C. Elliott & T. Richards (Eds.), Exploring inductive risk: Case studies of values in science (pp. 215–238). Oxford University Press.
    1. Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2020). Deaths of despair and the future of capitalism. Princeton University Press.
    1. Douglas H. Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of Science. 2000;67(4):559–579. doi: 10.1086/392855. - DOI
    1. Douglas H. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press; 2009.

LinkOut - more resources