A phase 1, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of KITE-585, an autologous anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
- PMID: 34249462
- PMCID: PMC8263642
A phase 1, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of KITE-585, an autologous anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Abstract
Despite advances in treatment, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will relapse, and long-term survival remains poor. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is an ideal therapeutic target as it is expressed throughout the disease course with normal tissue expression limited to plasma and some B-cell lineages. This phase 1, multicenter, first-in-human study evaluated the safety and efficacy of KITE-585, an autologous anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Key eligibility criteria included measurable MM and progression, defined by the International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Criteria within 60 days of the last treatment. Patients underwent leukapheresis and subsequently received a 3-day conditioning therapy regimen (cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2/day] and fludarabine [30 mg/m2/day]). Patients then received a flat dose of 3 × 107 to 1 × 109 KITE-585 CAR T cells in a 3+3 dose-escalation design. The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events (AEs) defined as dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Key secondary and exploratory endpoints included efficacy outcomes, incidence of AEs, levels of KITE-585 in blood, serum cytokines, and incidence of anti-BCMA CAR antibodies. Seventeen patients were enrolled, and 14 received KITE-585 with a median follow-up of 12.0 months. The median age of patients was 56 years, 41.2% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1, 92.9% had baseline BCMA expression on plasma cells, and median number of prior therapies was 5.5. No patients experienced a DLT, all patients experienced ≥ 1 grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE), and no grade 5 TEAEs were observed. There were no grade ≥ 3 events of cytokine release syndrome, neurologic events, or infections; all were grade 1 or 2, and each occurred in 21.4% of patients. Among all patients infused with KITE-585, 1 patient who received 3 × 107 anti-BCMA CAR T cells experienced a partial response. Median peak CAR T-cell expansion was low (0.98 cells/μL), as were median peak serum levels of CAR-associated cytokines, including interferon-γ (61.45 pg/mL) and interleukin-2 (0.9 pg/mL). KITE-585 demonstrated a manageable safety profile; however, the limited CAR T-cell expansion and associated lack of anti-tumor response in patients with RRMM treated with KITE-585 is consistent with the minimal CAR T-cell activity observed.
Keywords: B-cell maturation antigen; Chimeric antigen receptor T cell; relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
AJCR Copyright © 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
R.F.C. has employment with AbbVie; honoraria from Karyopharm, Takeda, and GlaxoSmithKline; and consultancy or advisory role for Karyopharm, Takeda, and GlaxoSmithKline. M.R.B: honoraria from Kite, a Gilead Company, Incyte, Celgene, Sanofi, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Agios; consultancy or advisory role for Novartis, Kite, a Gilead Company, CRISPR Therapeutics, Agios, Iovance, Bluebird Bio, WindMIL Therapeutics, and Arcellx; speakers’ bureau participation for Kite, a Gilead Company, Agios, Incyte, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb; research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, CRISPR Therapeutics, Arcellx, Autolus, Immatics, Triumvira, and Tmunity; and travel support from Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Agios, and Incyte. S.K. has a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Medimmune/AstraZeneca; research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Kite, a Gilead Company, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; other relationship with Oncopeptides Independent Review Committee. S.A.G. has a consulting or advisory role with Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, Sanofi, Pfizer, Miltenyi, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Actinium; and research funding from Amgen, Celgene, Sanofi, Pfizer, Actinium, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Miltenyi. A.K.N. has a consulting or advisory role with Takeda, Amgen, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Karyopharm, Adaptive, and Oncopeptides. S.M.L. has a consulting or advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb; speakers’ bureau participation for Takeda; research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Janssen, BioLineRx, and Novartis; and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. F.L.L. has a consulting or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, GammaDelta Therapeutics, Iovance, Bluebird Bio, Wugen Inc., Calibr, Cellular Biomedicine Group Inc., and Allogen; and research support from Kite, a Gilead Company. N.S.R. has a consulting or advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Bluebird Bio, Takeda, and Amgen; and research funding from Bluebird Bio. L.L. has employment with Lei Lei LLC; leadership role with Lei Lei LLC, stock or other ownership in Amgen; and consulting or advisory role with Kite, a Gilead Company, and BeiGene. J.D. has employment with Kite, a Gilead Company; consultancy or advisory role for GliaCure/Tufts; and patents, royalties, or other intellectual property from Patent US8598141 (Dec 03, 2013). J.B.L. has employment with Kite, a Gilead Company, and stock or other ownership in Gilead and Allogene. J.M.R. has employment with Kite, a Gilead Company. R.Z.O. has stock or other ownership in Asylia Therapeutics; patents, royalties, other intellectual property from MD Anderson and Asylia Therapeutics; research funding from BioTheryX, CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; advisory board membership for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital, Forma, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Juno, Kite, a Gilead Company, Legend, Molecular Partners, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, and Takeda; and consultancy or advisory role for STATinMED Research.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Anti-BCMA/GPRC5D bispecific CAR T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 1 trial.Lancet Haematol. 2024 Oct;11(10):e751-e760. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00176-5. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Lancet Haematol. 2024. PMID: 39059405 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase 1 study of C-CAR088, a novel humanized anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Sep;10(9):e005145. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005145. J Immunother Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36100310 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A combination of humanised anti-CD19 and anti-BCMA CAR T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial.Lancet Haematol. 2019 Oct;6(10):e521-e529. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30115-2. Epub 2019 Aug 1. Lancet Haematol. 2019. PMID: 31378662 Clinical Trial.
-
Lenalidomide enhances the efficacy of anti-BCMA CAR-T treatment in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a case report and revies of the literature.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 Jan;71(1):39-44. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-02959-8. Epub 2021 May 18. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022. PMID: 34003300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of CAR-Modified T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials.Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 3;11:544754. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.544754. eCollection 2020. Front Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 33343342 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring the efficacy and safety of anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Cytojournal. 2024 Mar 18;21:13. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_64_2023. eCollection 2024. Cytojournal. 2024. PMID: 38628287 Free PMC article.
-
Dose-response correlation for CAR-T cells: a systematic review of clinical studies.J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Dec;10(12):e005678. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005678. J Immunother Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36549782 Free PMC article.
-
An Assessment of the Effectiveness and Safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 3;25(9):4996. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094996. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38732213 Free PMC article.
-
Unveiling causal immune cell-gene associations in multiple myeloma: insights from systematic reviews and Mendelian randomization analyses.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 22;12:1456732. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1456732. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39911859 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity among patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1392831. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1392831. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39474369 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2020.
-
- Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1046–1060. - PubMed
-
- Egan JB, Shi CX, Tembe W, Christoforides A, Kurdoglu A, Sinari S, Middha S, Asmann Y, Schmidt J, Braggio E, Keats JJ, Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Craig DW, Carpten JD, Stewart AK. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides. Blood. 2012;120:1060–1066. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mackay F, Browning JL. BAFF: a fundamental survival factor for B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:465–475. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials