Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
- PMID: 34249562
- PMCID: PMC8253473
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15415
Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
Abstract
Sacroiliac (SI) joint pathology is a newly appreciated contributor to lower back pain. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has grown rapidly in popularity in association with the advent of minimally-invasive surgical techniques. This has led to an explosion of new medical devices used for SIJF. The objective of this article is to outline clinical trends, summarize the current data, and categorize novel devices for SIJF. Trends in SI joint pathology and fusion were obtained via the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and Web of Science. To review literature on devices for SIJF, PubMed was searched using the Boolean phrase "sacroiliac joint AND (fusion OR arthrodesis)" since 2010. To establish a list of SIJF devices not represented in the literature, searches were performed on the FDA 510(k), premarket approval, and de novo databases, as well as Google and LinkedIn. Literature review yielded 11 FDA-approved devices for minimally invasive SIJF. Database query yielded an additional 22 devices for a total of 33 devices. Twenty-one devices used the lateral transiliac approach, six posterior allograft approach, three posterolateral approach, and three combined the lateral transiliac and posterolateral approaches. The evidence for the lateral transiliac approach is the most robust. Many novel devices have been developed for minimally invasive SIJF over the past 10 years. Further randomized comparative trials are warranted to evaluate different surgical approaches and novel devices at this time.
Keywords: arthrodesis; fusion; medical device; minimally-invasive surgery; sacroiliac joint.
Copyright © 2021, Himstead et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550. Pain Physician. 2017. PMID: 28934785 Clinical Trial.
-
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016. Int J Spine Surg. 2016. PMID: 27652199 Free PMC article.
-
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27179664 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300. J Int Med Res. 2025. PMID: 39917851 Free PMC article.
-
Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain with Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis of the Sacroiliac Joint: (INSITE, iFuse, Tricor, Rialto, and others).Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Sep;8(3):1061-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00350-8. Epub 2021 Jul 30. Rheumatol Ther. 2021. PMID: 34331270 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared to sham operation: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 1;68:102438. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102438. eCollection 2024 Feb. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38328752 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Spinal Manipulative Therapy on Brain Function and Pain Alleviation in Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Resting-State fMRI Study.Chin J Integr Med. 2025 Feb;31(2):108-117. doi: 10.1007/s11655-024-4205-7. Epub 2024 Dec 21. Chin J Integr Med. 2025. PMID: 39707137
-
Potential S1 Nerve Root Blocks Associated with Sacroiliac Joint Injections.Pain Res Manag. 2024 Jul 30;2024:8064804. doi: 10.1155/2024/8064804. eCollection 2024. Pain Res Manag. 2024. PMID: 39109232 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):974-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08629-4. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39885048
-
Default mode network and dorsal attentional network connectivity changes as neural markers of spinal manipulative therapy in lumbar disc herniation.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 28;14(1):29541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81126-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39604454 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19668291/ Pain Physician. 2009;12:35–70. - PubMed
-
- The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:31–37. - PubMed
-
- How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Sembrano JN, Polly DW Jr. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:27–32. - PubMed
-
- The sacro-iliac joint: a potentially painful enigma. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of pain from micro-trauma. Le Huec JC, Tsoupras A, Leglise A, Heraudet P, Celarier G, Sturresson B. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:31–42. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous