Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
- PMID: 34249562
- PMCID: PMC8253473
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15415
Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
Abstract
Sacroiliac (SI) joint pathology is a newly appreciated contributor to lower back pain. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has grown rapidly in popularity in association with the advent of minimally-invasive surgical techniques. This has led to an explosion of new medical devices used for SIJF. The objective of this article is to outline clinical trends, summarize the current data, and categorize novel devices for SIJF. Trends in SI joint pathology and fusion were obtained via the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and Web of Science. To review literature on devices for SIJF, PubMed was searched using the Boolean phrase "sacroiliac joint AND (fusion OR arthrodesis)" since 2010. To establish a list of SIJF devices not represented in the literature, searches were performed on the FDA 510(k), premarket approval, and de novo databases, as well as Google and LinkedIn. Literature review yielded 11 FDA-approved devices for minimally invasive SIJF. Database query yielded an additional 22 devices for a total of 33 devices. Twenty-one devices used the lateral transiliac approach, six posterior allograft approach, three posterolateral approach, and three combined the lateral transiliac and posterolateral approaches. The evidence for the lateral transiliac approach is the most robust. Many novel devices have been developed for minimally invasive SIJF over the past 10 years. Further randomized comparative trials are warranted to evaluate different surgical approaches and novel devices at this time.
Keywords: arthrodesis; fusion; medical device; minimally-invasive surgery; sacroiliac joint.
Copyright © 2021, Himstead et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19668291/ Pain Physician. 2009;12:35–70. - PubMed
-
- The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:31–37. - PubMed
-
- How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Sembrano JN, Polly DW Jr. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:27–32. - PubMed
-
- The sacro-iliac joint: a potentially painful enigma. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of pain from micro-trauma. Le Huec JC, Tsoupras A, Leglise A, Heraudet P, Celarier G, Sturresson B. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:31–42. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous