Genomic medicine and the "loss of chance" medical malpractice doctrine
- PMID: 34250511
- PMCID: PMC8270012
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100032
Genomic medicine and the "loss of chance" medical malpractice doctrine
Abstract
As genomic medicine expands, interest in how medical malpractice law will apply to such questions as whether and when to return new or updated genomic results has grown. Given that access to some genomic results (such as those pertaining to minors or those for which scientific interpretations are unsettled) is delayed for years, the "loss of chance" (LOC) doctrine is of particular potential relevance. Yet it has received relatively little attention among scholars of law and genomics. We performed legal research to determine the status of this malpractice doctrine across the United States and consider its potential applicability to genomic medicine. We further examined known genomic medicine malpractices to assess whether this doctrine had yet been invoked in that context. We identified a trend toward adoption of the LOC doctrine, finding 29 states (58%) have adopted, 15 states (30%) have rejected, and six states (12%) have deferred or not yet addressed the doctrine. Attempts to invoke or apply the doctrine in the known genomic medical malpractice cases were also found. While our findings do not provide cause for substantial concern, the availability of the LOC medical malpractice doctrine is a potentially important factor to consider when making programmatic decisions for genomic medicine. Future research examining whether liability risks posed by this doctrine prompt defensive medicine practices would be useful.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests Both J.K.W. and M.N.M. are employed by Geisinger, an integrated health care system where genomic medicine is practiced; however, they are research faculty and are not affiliated with the institution’s legal department or delivery of care. J.K.W. has a part-time private law practice in Pennsylvania, but this practice does not involve medical malpractice work. J.K.W. is also an academic affiliate of Anthropology at Penn State University. The authors declare no other competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The changing landscape of military medical malpractice: from the Feres Doctrine to present.Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20594. Neurosurg Focus. 2020. PMID: 33130615
-
Informed consent: recent changes in the law.Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1975;67:29-30. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1975. PMID: 1233806
-
Loss of a chance in medical malpractice litigation: expanding liability of health professionals versus providing justice to those who have lost.J Law Med. 2001 Nov;9(2):200-14. J Law Med. 2001. PMID: 12375501
-
Liability for use of artificial intelligence in medicine.In: Solaiman B, Cohen IG, editors. Research Handbook on Health, AI and the Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2024 Jul 16. Chapter 9. In: Solaiman B, Cohen IG, editors. Research Handbook on Health, AI and the Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2024 Jul 16. Chapter 9. PMID: 40245228 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Informed consent: ethical and legal aspects.Thorac Surg Clin. 2005 May;15(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.02.005. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005. PMID: 15999519 Review.
Cited by
-
Dynamicasome-a molecular dynamics-guided and AI-driven pathogenicity prediction catalogue for all genetic mutations.Commun Biol. 2025 Jul 7;8(1):958. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08334-y. Commun Biol. 2025. PMID: 40624350 Free PMC article.
-
Global, regional, and national time trends in mortality for breast cancer, 1992-2021: an age-period-cohort analysis for the global burden of disease 2021 study.BMC Public Health. 2025 May 1;25(1):1599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22855-5. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40312658 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Marchant G.E., Lindor R.A. Genomic malpractice: an emerging tide or gentle ripple? Food Drug Law J. 2018;73:1–36.
-
- Marchant G., LeRoy B., Clatch L., Clayton E.W. Unjust timing limitations in genetic malpractice cases. Albany Law Rev. 2020;83:61–87.
-
- Giesbertz N.A.A., van Harten W.H., Bredenoord A.L. A duty to recontact in genetics: context matters. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019;20:371–372. - PubMed
-
- Knoppers B.M., Thorogood A., Zawati M.H. Letter: Relearning the 3 R’s? Reinterpretation, recontact, and return of genetic variants. Genet. Med. 2019;21:2401–2402. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials