Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec;28(12):1421-1429.
doi: 10.1111/acem.14343. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Enrollment with and without exception from informed consent in a pilot trial of tranexamic acid in children with hemorrhagic injuries

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Enrollment with and without exception from informed consent in a pilot trial of tranexamic acid in children with hemorrhagic injuries

Seth W Linakis et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Federal exception from informed consent (EFIC) procedures allow studies to enroll patients with time-sensitive, life-threatening conditions when written consent is not feasible. Our objective was to compare enrollment rates with and without EFIC in a trial of tranexamic acid (TXA) for children with hemorrhagic injuries.

Methods: We conducted a four-center randomized controlled pilot and feasibility trial evaluating TXA in children with severe hemorrhagic brain and/or torso injuries. We initiated the trial enrolling patients without EFIC. After 3 months of enrollment, we met our a priori futility threshold and paused the trial to incorporate EFIC procedures and obtain regulatory approval. We then restarted the trial allowing EFIC if the guardian was unable to provide timely written consent. We used descriptive statistics to compare characteristics of eligible patients approached with and without EFIC procedures. We also calculated the time delay to restart the trial using EFIC.

Results: We enrolled one of 15 (6.7%) eligible patients (0.17 per site per month) prior to using EFIC procedures. Of the 14 missed eligible patients, seven (50%) were not enrolled because guardians were not present or were injured and unable to provide written consent. After obtaining approval for EFIC, we enrolled 30 of 48 (62.5%) eligible patients (1.34 per site per month). Of these 30 patients, 22 (73.3%) were enrolled with EFIC. Of the 22, no guardians refused written consent after randomization. There were no significant differences in the eligibility rate and patient characteristics enrolled with and without EFIC procedures. Across all sites, the mean delay to restart the trial using EFIC procedures was 12 months.

Conclusions: In a multicenter trial of severely injured children, the use of EFIC procedures greatly increased the enrollment rate and was well accepted by guardians. Initiating the trial without EFIC procedures led to a significant delay in enrollment.

Keywords: exception from informed consent (EFIC); pediatric trauma; tranexamic acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure:

All listed authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Consent procedures during the post-EFIC phase of the TIC-TOC trial
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Duration of trial without exception from informed consent (EFIC), paused for regulatory approval and community consultations (dashed lines), and with EFIC a– Pre-EFIC, enrolled 6/12/18 to 9/10/18; Post-EFIC 3/4/19 to 1/5/20 (community consultations were completed as part of separate study thus shorter time to restarting enrollment) b– Pre-EFIC, enrolled 8/15/18 to 9/10/18; Post-EFIC 10/4/19 to 3/13/20 c– Pre-EFIC, enrolled 7/17/18 to 9/10/18; Post-EFIC 10/8/19 to 3/25/20 d– Pre-EFIC (did not open for enrollment); Post-EFIC 2/10/20 to 3/13/20
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
CONSORT diagram a - not mutually exclusive

References

    1. Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. Federal Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents.... Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Campwala I, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. Patient and surrogate attitudes via an interviewer-administered survey on exception from informed consent enrollment in the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial. BMC Emerg Med 2020; 20:76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickert NW, Mah VA, Baren JM, et al. Enrollment in research under exception from informed consent: the Patients’ Experiences in Emergency Research (PEER) study. Resuscitation 2013;84:1416–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Govindarajan P, Dickert NW, Meeker M, et al. Emergency research: using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:98–103. - PubMed
    1. Sims CA, Isserman JA, Holena D, et al. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: consulting the trauma community. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:157–65. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances