Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;17(7):e947-e957.
doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00276.

Moral Distress Among Oncology Social Workers

Affiliations

Moral Distress Among Oncology Social Workers

Ting Guan et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Literature on moral distress among oncology social workers (OSWs) is sparse. The aim of the current study was to examine the prevalence of moral distress and its domains of influence, and to identify demographic and work-related characteristics associated with moral distress among OSWs.

Methods: Data came from the Oncology Social Work Competencies, Opportunities, Roles, and Expertise survey, conducted from August to September 2020 (during the COVID-19 global pandemic). Data collected included demographic information (eg, age, sex, and race) and work-related characteristics (eg, job position, organization type, work setting, employment status, salary, years in the profession, and OSW-C certification). Moral distress was measured using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals. Tests of association, including multivariate linear regression, were conducted to achieve the research aims.

Results: Total moral distress scores on the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (range 0-432) for 745 OSWs ranged from 1 to 273, with an average score of 74.0. The three highest indicators of moral distress were observed in the patient or family experience domain. Higher levels of moral distress were associated with younger age, being a direct service provider, provision of inpatient cancer care, and more years in the profession.

Conclusion: OSWs are experiencing moral distress. Institutional investments in professional education and support of OSWs are needed to mitigate and possibly prevent moral distress experienced by cancer care providers and thus ensure the delivery of quality psychosocial care for patients with cancer and their families.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Krista NelsonConsulting or Advisory Role: AthenexNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Item means for moral distress.

References

    1. Page AE, Adler NE. Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008. - PubMed
    1. Christ G, Messner C, Behar L. Handbook of Oncology Social Work: Psychosocial Care for People With Cancer. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Deshields T, Zebrack B, Kennedy V.The state of psychosocial services in cancer care in the United States Psychooncology 22699–7032013 - PubMed
    1. Courtnage T, Bates NE, Armstrong AA, et al. Enhancing integrated psychosocial oncology through leveraging the oncology social worker's role in collaborative care Psychooncology 292084–20902020 - PubMed
    1. LeNoble CA, Pegram R, Shuffler ML, et al. To address burnout in oncology, we must look to teams: Reflections on an organizational science approach JCO Oncol Pract 16e377–e3832020 - PubMed

Publication types