Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 12;15(1):24.
doi: 10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3.

Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review

Samuel Weprin et al. Patient Saf Surg. .

Abstract

Background: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management.

Methods: Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical "sharps," a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of "sharps". Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview.

Results: Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery.

Conclusion: The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.

Keywords: Detection; Foreign object; Management; Retained surgical item; Surgical sharps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SW sits on the Board of Directors for a medical device corporation that focuses on retained foreign bodies. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The importance of teamwork in RSI prevention (Figures can be printed in grayscale) Provenance and peer review not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

References

    1. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. (n.d.). Retained surgical items: events and guidelines revisited advisory. Retrieved April 25, 2021, from Patientsafety.pa.gov website: http://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Pages/201703_RSI.aspx
    1. Al-Qurayshi ZH, Hauch AT, Slakey DP, Kandil E. Retained Foreign Bodies: Risk and Outcomes at the National Level. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):749–759. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stawicki SPA, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Ahmed HM. Retained Surgical Items: A Problem Yet to Be Solved. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lovrec VG, Cokan A, Lukman L, Arko D, Takač I. Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review. J Int Med Res [Internet] 2018;46(11):4775–4780. doi: 10.1177/0300060518788247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hacivelioglu S, Karatag O, Gungor AC. Is there an advantage of three dimensional computed tomography scanning over plain abdominal radiograph in the detection of retained needles in the abdomen? Int J Surg. 2013;11(3):278–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.01.009. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources