Comparing the effectiveness of Atazanavir/Ritonavir/Dolutegravir/Hydroxychloroquine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir/Hydroxychloroquine treatment regimens in COVID-19 patients
- PMID: 34255369
- PMCID: PMC8426706
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27195
Comparing the effectiveness of Atazanavir/Ritonavir/Dolutegravir/Hydroxychloroquine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir/Hydroxychloroquine treatment regimens in COVID-19 patients
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Atazanavir/Ritonavir/Dolutegravir/Hydroxychloroquine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir/Hydroxychloroquine treatment regimens in COVID-19 patients based on clinical and laboratory parameters. We prospectively evaluated the clinical and laboratory outcomes of 62 moderate to severe COVID-19 patients during a 10-day treatment plan. Patients were randomly assigned to either KH (receiving Lopinavir/Ritonavir [Kaletra] plus Hydroxychloroquine) or ADH (receiving Atazanavir/Ritonavir, Dolutegravir, and Hydroxychloroquine) groups. During this period, clinical and laboratory parameters and outcomes such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission or mortality rate were recorded. Compared to the KH group, after the treatment period, patients in the ADH group had higher activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (12, [95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.97, 17.06), p = <0.01), international normalized ratio (INR) (0.17, [95% CI: 0.07, 0.27), p = <0.01) and lower C-reactive protein (CRP) (-14.29, (95% CI: -26.87, -1.71), p = 0.03) and potassium (-0.53, (95% CI: -1.03, -0.03), p = 0.04) values. Moreover, a higher number of patients in the KH group needed invasive ventilation (6 (20%) vs. 1 (3.1%), p = 0.05) and antibiotic administration (27 (90%) vs. 21(65.6), p = 0.02) during hospitalization while patients in the ADH group needed more corticosteroid administration (9 (28.1%) vs. 2 (6.7%), p = 0.03). There was no difference in mortality rate, ICU admission rate, and hospitalization period between the study groups. Our results suggest that the Atazanavir/Dolutegravir treatment regimen may result in a less severe disease course compared to the Lopinavir/Ritonavir treatment regimen and can be considered as an alternative treatment option beside standard care. However, to confirm our results, larger-scale studies are recommended.
Keywords: Atazanavir; COVID-19; Dolutegravir; Hydroxychloroquine; Lopinavir; Ritonavir.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Similar articles
-
Comparing outcomes of hospitalized patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 following treatment with hydroxychloroquine plus atazanavir/ritonavir.Daru. 2020 Dec;28(2):625-634. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00369-2. Epub 2020 Aug 28. Daru. 2020. PMID: 32857301 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in symptomatic patients of Covid-19 infection - a randomised controlled trial (SEV-COVID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 20;21(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04774-5. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33081849 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of Interferon Beta 1a, compared to Interferon Beta 1b and the usual therapeutic regimen to treat adults with moderate to severe COVID-19: structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04382-3. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32493468 Free PMC article.
-
Umifenovir in hospitalized moderate to severe COVID-19 patients: A randomized clinical trial.Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Oct;99:107969. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107969. Epub 2021 Jul 10. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34273635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current evidence for the risk of PR prolongation, QRS widening, QT prolongation, from lopinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir, and saquinavir: A systematic review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 6;100(31):e26787. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026787. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. PMID: 34397829 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
How to use COVID-19 antiviral drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1053814. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1053814. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36843922 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Atazanavir Is a Competitive Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, Impairing Variants Replication In Vitro and In Vivo.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;15(1):21. doi: 10.3390/ph15010021. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 35056078 Free PMC article.
-
Protein structure-based in-silico approaches to drug discovery: Guide to COVID-19 therapeutics.Mol Aspects Med. 2023 Jun;91:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2022.101151. Epub 2022 Oct 28. Mol Aspects Med. 2023. PMID: 36371228 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent advances in small-molecular therapeutics for COVID-19.Precis Clin Med. 2022 Sep 24;5(4):pbac024. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbac024. eCollection 2022 Dec. Precis Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36268466 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comparative Study of Antiretroviral (Lopinavir/Ritonavir) and Remdesivir Used in the Pandemic in Iraq on the Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2.Arch Razi Inst. 2023 Jun 30;78(3):935-941. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.360354.2574. eCollection 2023 Jun. Arch Razi Inst. 2023. PMID: 38028857 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update--9.... Accessed February 9, 2020.
-
- Chan KS, Lai ST, Chu CM, et al. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9(6):399‐406. - PubMed
-
- Kiselev OI, Maleev VV, Deeva EG, et al. Clinical efficacy of Аrbidol (umifenovir) in the therapy of influenza in adults: preliminary results of the multicenter double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled study ARBITR. Ter Arkh. 2015;87(1):88‐96. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous