Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Feb 1;50(2):245-255.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005185.

Trends in ICU Mortality From Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Tale of Three Surges

Affiliations
Observational Study

Trends in ICU Mortality From Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Tale of Three Surges

Sara C Auld et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association between time period of hospitalization and hospital mortality among critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019.

Design: Observational cohort study from March 6, 2020, to January 31, 2021.

Setting: ICUs at four hospitals within an academic health center network in Atlanta, GA.

Patients: Adults greater than or equal to 18 years with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to an ICU during the study period (i.e., Surge 1: March to April, Lull 1: May to June, Surge 2: July to August, Lull 2: September to November, Surge 3: December to January).

Measurements and main results: Among 1,686 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to an ICU during the study period, all-cause hospital mortality was 29.7%. Mortality differed significantly over time: 28.7% in Surge 1, 21.3% in Lull 1, 25.2% in Surge 2, 30.2% in Lull 2, 34.7% in Surge 3 (p = 0.007). Mortality was significantly associated with 1) preexisting risk factors (older age, race, ethnicity, lower body mass index, higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, admission from a nursing home); 2) clinical status at ICU admission (higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, higher d-dimer, higher C-reactive protein); and 3) ICU interventions (receipt of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, renal replacement therapy, inhaled vasodilators). After adjusting for baseline and clinical variables, there was a significantly increased risk of mortality associated with admission during Lull 2 (relative risk, 1.37 [95% CI = 1.03-1.81]) and Surge 3 (relative risk, 1.35 [95% CI = 1.04-1.77]) as compared to Surge 1.

Conclusions: Despite increased experience and evidence-based treatments, the risk of death for patients admitted to the ICU with coronavirus disease 2019 was highest during the fall and winter of 2020. Reasons for this increased mortality are not clear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Auld received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of age (A), baseline comorbidities (B), and ICU interventions (C) over the study time periods (i.e., surges and lulls) for all patients admitted to the ICU with coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 1,686). CAD = coronary artery disease, CHF = congestive heart failure, CKD = chronic kidney disease, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CRRT = continuous renal replacement therapy, DM = diabetes mellitus, ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ESRD = end-stage renal disease, HD = hemodialysis, HTN = hypertension, Vent = ventilator.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
All-cause, in-hospital mortality over time for patients admitted to the ICU with coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 1,686). A, Crude daily in-hospital mortality (black solid line) with 70% and 90% CIs in gray and daily ICU census (red dashed line) over the study time periods. B, Relative risk of death across study time periods in unadjusted, baseline, and complete models. The baseline model is adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and admission from a nursing home. The complete model is adjusted for all variables in the baseline model in addition to d-dimer, C-reactive protein, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, remdesivir, steroids, renal replacement therapy, bacteremia, bacterial pneumonia, and ICU length of stay.

References

    1. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, et al. : Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020; 323:1612–1614 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, et al. : COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle Region — case series. N Engl J Medicine. 2020; 382:2012–2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. : Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180:934–943 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. : Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395:1054–1062 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auld SC, Caridi-Scheible M, Blum JM, et al. : ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Med. 2020; 48:e799–e804 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types