Phase II Randomized Study of CMB305 and Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab Alone in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Expressing NY-ESO-1
- PMID: 34260265
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.03452
Phase II Randomized Study of CMB305 and Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab Alone in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Expressing NY-ESO-1
Abstract
Purpose: CMB305 is a heterologous prime-boost vaccination regimen created to prime NY-ESO-1-specific CD8 T-cell populations and then activate the immune response with a potent TLR-4 agonist. This open-label randomized phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding the CMB305 regimen to atezolizumab (anti-programmed death ligand-1 therapy) in comparison with atezolizumab alone in patients with synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma.
Patients and methods: Patients with locally advanced, relapsed, or metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma (any grade) were randomly assigned to receive CMB305 with atezolizumab (experimental arm) or atezolizumab alone (control arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety and immune responses were assessed.
Results: A total of 89 patients were enrolled; 55.1% had received ≥ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Median PFS was 2.6 months and 1.6 months in the combination and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.3). Median OS was 18 months in both treatment arms. Patients treated with combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of treatment-induced NY-ESO-1-specific T cells (P = .01) and NY-ESO-1-specific antibody responses (P < .0001). In a post hoc analysis of all dosed patients, OS was longer (36 months) in the subset who developed anti-NY-ESO-1 T-cell immune response (hazard ratio, 0.3; P = .02).
Conclusion: Although the combination of CMB305 and atezolizumab did not result in significant increases in PFS or OS compared with atezolizumab alone, some patients demonstrated evidence of an anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response and appeared to fare better by imaging than those without such an immune response. Combining prime-boost vaccines such as CMB305 with anti-programmed death ligand-1 therapies merits further evaluation in other clinical contexts.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02609984.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Immunotherapy for Sarcoma: A Work in Progress.J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 20;40(12):1267-1270. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01338. Epub 2022 Mar 8. J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35259000 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of CMB305, a Lentiviral-Based Prime-Boost Vaccine Regimen, in Patients with Locally Advanced, Relapsed, or Metastatic Cancer Expressing NY-ESO-1.Oncoimmunology. 2020 Nov 19;9(1):1847846. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1847846. Oncoimmunology. 2020. PMID: 33312760 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The potential of the CMB305 vaccine regimen to target NY-ESO-1 and improve outcomes for synovial sarcoma and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma patients.Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018 Feb;17(2):107-114. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1419068. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018. PMID: 29280411 Free PMC article. Review.
-
IL-15 mediated expansion of rare durable memory T cells following adoptive cellular therapy.J Immunother Cancer. 2021 May;9(5):e002232. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002232. J Immunother Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33963013 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immunohistochemical expression and clinicopathological assessment of the cancer testis antigens NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 in high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma.Oncol Lett. 2019 Apr;17(4):3937-3943. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10044. Epub 2019 Feb 14. Oncol Lett. 2019. PMID: 30881511 Free PMC article.
-
Immunotherapy of sarcomas with modified T cells.Curr Opin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;34(4):362-370. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000843. Curr Opin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35837706 Review.
Cited by
-
Targeting liposarcoma: unveiling molecular pathways and therapeutic opportunities.Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 11;14:1484027. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1484027. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39723387 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunological differences between monophasic and biphasic synovial sarcoma with implications for immunotherapy.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2024 Dec 21;74(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00262-024-03868-2. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2024. PMID: 39708175 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and translational implications of immunotherapy in sarcomas.Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 25;15:1378398. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1378398. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38983859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
NY-ESO-1 antigen: A promising frontier in cancer immunotherapy.Clin Transl Med. 2024 Sep;14(9):e70020. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70020. Clin Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 39275923 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advancement insights in cancer vaccines: mechanisms, types, and clinical applications.Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Mar 7;52(1):290. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-10370-0. Mol Biol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40053260 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials