Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 1;106(4):722-733.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003893.

Pretransplant Patient Education in Solid-organ Transplant: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Pretransplant Patient Education in Solid-organ Transplant: A Narrative Review

Marzan Hamid et al. Transplantation. .

Abstract

Education for pretransplant, solid-organ recipient candidates aims to improve knowledge and understanding about the transplant process, outcomes, and potential complications to support informed, shared decision-making to reduce fears and anxieties about transplant, inform expectations, and facilitate adjustment to posttransplant life. In this review, we summarize novel pretransplant initiatives and approaches to educate solid-organ transplant recipient candidates. First, we review approaches that may be common to all solid-organ transplants, then we summarize interventions specific to kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplant. We describe evidence that emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary approaches to transplant education. We also summarize initiatives that consider online (eHealth) and mobile (mHealth) solutions. Finally, we highlight education initiatives that support racialized or otherwise marginalized communities to improve equitable access to solid-organ transplant. A considerable amount of work has been done in solid-organ transplant since the early 2000s with promising results. However, many studies on education for pretransplant recipient candidates involve relatively small samples and nonrandomized designs and focus on short-term surrogate outcomes. Overall, many of these studies have a high risk of bias. Frequently, interventions assessed are not well characterized or they are combined with administrative and data-driven initiatives into multifaceted interventions, which makes it difficult to assess the impact of the education component on outcomes. In the future, well-designed studies rigorously assessing well-defined surrogate and clinical outcomes will be needed to evaluate the impact of many promising initiatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Bezinover D, Saner F. Organ transplantation in the modern era. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:32.
    1. Black CK, Termanini KM, Aguirre O, et al. Solid organ transplantation in the 21 st century. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:409.
    1. Rana A, Gruessner A, Agopian VG, et al. Survival benefit of solid-organ transplant in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:252–259.
    1. Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC, et al. The life-years saved by a deceased organ donor. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2289–2296.
    1. Andersen MH, Wahl AK, Engebretsen E, et al. Implementing a tailored education programme: renal transplant recipients’ experiences. J Ren Care. 2019;45:111–119.

LinkOut - more resources