Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0254601.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254601. eCollection 2021.

Characterizing the sectoral development of cities

Affiliations

Characterizing the sectoral development of cities

Diego Rybski et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Previous research has identified a predictive model of how a nation's distribution of gross domestic product (GDP) among agriculture (a), industry (i), and services (s) changes as a country develops. Here we use this national model to analyze the composition of GDP for US Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) over time. To characterize the transfer of GDP shares between the sectors in the course of economic development we explore a simple system of differential equations proposed in the country-level model. Fitting the model to more than 120 MSAs we find that according to the obtained parameters MSAs can be classified into 6 groups (consecutive, high industry, re-industrializing; each of them also with reversed development direction). The consecutive transfer (a → i → s) is common but does not represent all MSAs examined. At the 95% confidence level, 40% of MSAs belong to types exhibiting an increasing share of GDP from agriculture. In California, such MSAs, which we classify as part of an agriculture renaissance, are found in the Central Valley.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) examples of sectoral development.
(a) Agriculture, a(g), as a function of the total urban GDP in log-log representation; (b) industry (bottom), i, and service (top), s, as a function of the total urban GDP in log-linear representation. The MSA are, 1: Great Falls, MT (type A [96%], GeoFIPS 24500), 2: East Stroudsburg, PA (type B [100%], GeoFIPS 20700), 3: Fresno, CA (type B [97%], GeoFIPS 23420), 4: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL (type C [81%], GeoFIPS 33100), and 5: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA (type A [100%], GeoFIPS 31080). Percentages in square-brackets represent confidence from bootstrapping. Dots represent the data and straight lines stem from the DST model Eqs (1)–(3).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Histogram of the parameter k1 from Eq (1) for (a) all considered MSAs and (b) those MSAs for which the type could be determined with at least 95% confidence.
Unit bin-width was used and the bins are centered on integer values. The value k1 = 2 means that if the total GDP increases by e.g. 5% then the share of agriculture decreases by 10%.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Locations of the MSA and their types at 95% confidence as summarized in Table 2.
Top panel: contiguous USA (the black lines delineate states). Bottom panel: the state of California (the white lines delineate counties). The colors distinguish the types A/A and B/B. The shape of the symbols indicates the direction of development, i.e. triangles for gg0 > 0 and circles for gg0 < 0 (“time reversal”).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Illustration of the transfer dynamics among urban agriculture, urban industry, and urban service.
(a) For illustrative purposes here we use a different set of parameters, namely dadg=-kaia-kasa, didg=kaia-kisi, dsdg=kasa+kisi, with kai = αk1, kis = k2, and kas = (1 − α)k1 [7]. (b) Illustrative example of Eqs (1)–(3), i.e. for k1 = 0.3, k2 = 0.2, α = 0.9, and g0 = 0.

References

    1. Friedmann J. The world city hypothesis. Dev Change. 1986;17(1):69–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1986.tb00231.x - DOI
    1. Clark C. The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmillan; 1940.
    1. Fisher AGB. Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Econ Rec. 1939;15(1):24–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1939.tb01015.x - DOI
    1. Fourastié J. Le Grand Espoir du XXe Siècle: progrès technique, progrès économique, progrès social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1949.
    1. Krüger JJ. Productivity and structural change: a review of the literature. J Econ Surv. 2008;22(2):330–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00539.x - DOI