Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul 14;25(1):246.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03668-5.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as mechanical circulatory support in adult septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data meta-regression analysis

Ryan Ruiyang Ling #  1 , Kollengode Ramanathan #  2   3 , Wynne Hsing Poon  1 , Chuen Seng Tan  4 , Nicolas Brechot  5   6 , Daniel Brodie  7 , Alain Combes  5   8 , Graeme MacLaren  1   9
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as mechanical circulatory support in adult septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data meta-regression analysis

Ryan Ruiyang Ling et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: While recommended by international societal guidelines in the paediatric population, the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) as mechanical circulatory support for refractory septic shock in adults is controversial. We aimed to characterise the outcomes of adults with septic shock requiring VA ECMO, and identify factors associated with survival.

Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases from inception until 1st June 2021, and included all relevant publications reporting on > 5 adult patients requiring VA ECMO for septic shock. Study quality and certainty in evidence were assessed using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, respectively. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, duration of ECMO support, complications while on ECMO, and sources of sepsis. Random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird) were conducted.

Data synthesis: We included 14 observational studies with 468 patients in the meta-analysis. Pooled survival was 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.6%-50.1%). Survival among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20% (62.0%, 95%-CI: 51.6%-72.0%) was significantly higher than those with LVEF > 35% (32.1%, 95%-CI: 8.69%-60.7%, p = 0.05). Survival reported in studies from Asia (19.5%, 95%-CI: 13.0%-26.8%) was notably lower than those from Europe (61.0%, 95%-CI: 48.4%-73.0%) and North America (45.5%, 95%-CI: 16.7%-75.8%). GRADE assessment indicated high certainty of evidence for pooled survival.

Conclusions: When treated with VA ECMO, the majority of patients with septic shock and severe sepsis-induced myocardial depression survive. However, VA ECMO has poor outcomes in adults with septic shock without severe left ventricular depression. VA ECMO may be a viable treatment option in carefully selected adult patients with refractory septic shock.

Keywords: ECMO; Mechanical circulatory support; Septic cardiomyopathy; Septic shock; Venoarterial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DB receives research support from ALung Technologies. He has been on the medical advisory boards for Baxter, Abiomed, Xenios and Hemovent. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of survivors among adult patients with septic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of survivors among adult patients with septic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation stratified by ejection fraction
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. York Health Economic Consortium. The Cost of Sepsis Care in the UK. http://allcatsrgrey.org.uk/wp/wpfb-file/yhec-sepsis-report-17-02-17-fina.... Accessed 12 May 2021.
    1. World Health Organisation. Improving the prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of sepsis. https://www.who.int/servicedeliverysafety/areas/sepsis/en/. Accessed 12 May 2021.
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al. The Third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200–211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwarzkopf D, Rüddel H, Gründling M, Putensen C, Reinhart K. The German Quality Network Sepsis: study protocol for the evaluation of a quality collaborative on decreasing sepsis-related mortality in a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0706-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources