Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 9;9(3):2325967120987241.
doi: 10.1177/2325967120987241. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Health Economic Evaluations of Hip and Knee Interventions in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Health Economic Evaluations of Hip and Knee Interventions in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment

Codie A Primeau et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: The economic burden of musculoskeletal diseases is substantial and growing. Economic evaluations compare costs and health benefits of interventions simultaneously to help inform value-based care; thus, it is crucial to ensure that studies are using appropriate methodology to provide valid evidence on the cost-effectiveness of interventions. This is particularly the case in orthopaedic sports medicine, where several interventions of varying costs are available to treat common hip and knee conditions.

Purpose: To summarize and evaluate the quality of economic evaluations in orthopaedic sports medicine for knee and hip interventions and identify areas for quality improvement.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: The Medline, AMED, OVID Health Star, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2020, to identify economic evaluations that compared ≥2 interventions for hip and/or knee conditions in orthopaedic sports medicine. We assessed the quality of full economic evaluations using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool, which consists of 16 questions for a total score of 100. We classified studies into quartiles based on QHES score (extremely poor quality to high quality) and we evaluated the frequency of studies that addressed each of the 16 QHES questions.

Results: A total of 93 studies were included in the systematic review. There were 41 (44%) cost analyses, of which 21 (51%) inappropriately concluded interventions were cost-effective. Only 52 (56%) of the included studies were full economic evaluations, although 40 of these (77%) fell in the high-quality quartile. The mean QHES score was 83.2 ± 19. Authors consistently addressed 12 of the QHES questions; questions that were missed or unclear were related to statistical uncertainty, appropriateness of costing methodology, and discussion of potential biases. The most frequently missed question was whether the cost perspective of the analysis was stated and justified.

Conclusion: The number of studies in orthopaedic sports medicine is small, despite their overall good quality. Yet, there are still many highly cited studies based on low-quality or partial economic evaluations that are being used to influence clinical decision-making. Investigators should follow international health economic guidelines for study design and critical appraisal of studies to further improve quality.

Keywords: QHES; economic evaluation; sports medicine; study quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: L.E.S. reports institutional support from Smith & Nephew, DePuy, Stryker, and Zimmer, outside of the submitted work. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) study flowchart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The frequency of economic evaluations relating to sports medicine (N = 93) published in English over time (ie, years). Studies are separated by type of economic evaluation, with partial economic evaluations (n = 41) presented in pink and full economic evaluations (n = 52) presented in purple. The bar labels represent the number of studies for each year interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The Quality of Health Economics (QHES) total score for all studies (n = 52) by point decile.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The Quality of Health Economics (QHES) total score for all studies (n = 52) over time (years).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Mean Quality of Health Economics (QHES) total score by geographical location (n = 52).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Mean Quality of Health Economics (QHES) total score by study intervention group (n = 52).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The percentage of orthopaedic sports medicine studies addressing each of the 16 questions of the Quality of Health Economics (QHES) (n = 52).

References

    1. Aae TF, Randsborg PH, Luras H, Aroen A, Lian OB. Microfracture is more cost-effective than autologous chondrocyte implantation: a review of level 1 and level 2 studies with 5 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:1044–1052. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhashemi JA, Miller DR, O’Brien HV, Hull KA. Cost-effectiveness of inhalational, balanced and total intravenous anaesthesia for ambulatory knee surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:118–125. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RE, Sartipy U, Jakobsson JG. Use of conventional ECG electrodes for depth of anaesthesia monitoring using the cerebral state index: a clinical study in day surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:645–648. - PubMed
    1. Aronowitz ER, Kleinbart FA. Outpatient ACL reconstruction using intraoperative local analgesia and oral postoperative pain medication. Orthopedics. 1998;21:781–784. - PubMed
    1. Barnds B, Morris B, Mullen S, Schroeppel JP, Tarakemeh A, Vopat BG. Increased rates of knee arthroplasty and cost of patients with meniscal tears treated with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus non-operative management. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:2316–2321. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources