Consumer Wearables and the Integration of New Objective Measures in Oncology: Patient and Provider Perspectives
- PMID: 34264191
- PMCID: PMC8323022
- DOI: 10.2196/28664
Consumer Wearables and the Integration of New Objective Measures in Oncology: Patient and Provider Perspectives
Abstract
With one in five adults in the United States owning a smartwatch or fitness tracker, these devices are poised to impact all aspects of medicine by offering a more objective approach to replace self-reported data. Oncology has proved to be a prototypical example, and wearables offer immediate benefits to patients and oncologists with the ability to track symptoms and health metrics in real time. We aimed to review the recent literature on consumer-grade wearables and its current applications in cancer from the perspective of both the patient and the provider. The relevant studies suggested that these devices offer benefits, such as improved medication adherence and accuracy of symptom tracking over self-reported data, as well as insights that increase patient empowerment. Physical activity is consistently correlated with stronger patient outcomes, and a patient's real-time metrics were found to be capable of tracking medication side effects and toxicity. Studies have made associations between wearable data and telomere shortening, cardiovascular disease, alcohol consumption, sleep apnea, and other conditions. The objective data obtained by the wearable presents a more complete picture of an individual's health than the snapshot of a 15-minute office visit and a single set of vital signs. Real-time metrics can be translated into a digital phenotype that identifies risk factors specific to each patient, and shared risk factors across one's social network may uncover common environmental exposures detrimental to one's health. Wearable data and its upcoming integration with social media will be the foundation for the next generation of personalized medicine.
Keywords: apps; cancer; chemotherapy; consumer; oncology; smartwatch; wearables.
©Lakshan N Fonseka, Benjamin KP Woo. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 15.07.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29720359 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 25;10(1):e34384. doi: 10.2196/34384. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022. PMID: 35076409 Free PMC article.
-
Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 22;20(3):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9157. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29567635 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Wearables in Clinical Trials During Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 11;8(11):e22006. doi: 10.2196/22006. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 33174852 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of Use and Key Predictors for the Use of Wearable Health Care Devices by US Adults: Insights from a National Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 16;22(10):e22443. doi: 10.2196/22443. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33064083 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Wearables in Schizophrenia: Update on Current and Future Clinical Applications.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 7;10(4):e35600. doi: 10.2196/35600. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022. PMID: 35389361 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the impact of body location on the accuracy of detecting daily activities with accelerometer data.iScience. 2024 Jan 6;27(2):108626. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108626. eCollection 2024 Feb 16. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38318391 Free PMC article.
-
Monitoring Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Cancer via a Smart T-Shirt: Prospective, Single-Cohort, Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (OncoSmartShirt Study).JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 May 1;12:e50620. doi: 10.2196/50620. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 38717366 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of Using Wearables for Home Monitoring during Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer-Results from the OncoWatch 1.0 Study.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;15(2):422. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020422. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36672370 Free PMC article.
-
Iowa Newborn Screening Program Experience with Hemoglobinopathy Screening over the Last Two Decades and Its Increasing Global Relevance.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Mar 8;10(1):21. doi: 10.3390/ijns10010021. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024. PMID: 38535125 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vogels EA. About one-in-five Americans use a smart watch or fitness tracker. Pew Research Center. [2021-03-01]. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/09/about-one-in-five-ameri...
-
- Chong KPL, Guo JZ, Deng X, Woo BKP. Consumer Perceptions of Wearable Technology Devices: Retrospective Review and Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 20;8(4):e17544. doi: 10.2196/17544. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/4/e17544/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hergenroeder AL, Barone Gibbs B, Kotlarczyk MP, Perera S, Kowalsky RJ, Brach JS. Accuracy and Acceptability of Commercial-Grade Physical Activity Monitors in Older Adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Apr 01;27(2):222–229. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0036. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30117355 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Beauchamp UL, Pappot H, Holländer-Mieritz C. The Use of Wearables in Clinical Trials During Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 11;8(11):e22006. doi: 10.2196/22006. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/11/e22006/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources