Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 15;21(1):1401.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3.

Health authorities' health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review

Siv Hilde Berg  1 , Jane K O'Hara  2 , Marie Therese Shortt  3 , Henriette Thune  3 , Kolbjørn Kallesten Brønnick  3   4 , Daniel Adrian Lungu  3 , Jo Røislien  3 , Siri Wiig  3
Affiliations

Health authorities' health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review

Siv Hilde Berg et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities' ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria.

Results: The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities' use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices.

Conclusion: Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities' videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public.

Keywords: COVID-19; H1N1; Health communication; Media communication; Pandemic; Risk communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Choropleth of data collection distribution by continents/globally
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Porta M. A dictionary of epidemiology. USA: Oxford university press; 2014.
    1. Baekkeskov E, Rubin O. Why pandemic response is unique: powerful experts and hands-off political leaders. Disaster Prev Manag. 2014;23(1):81–93. doi: 10.1108/DPM-05-2012-0060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tooher R, Collins JE, Street JM, Braunack-Mayer A, Marshall H. Community knowledge, behaviours and attitudes about the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a systematic review. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013;7(6):1316–1327. doi: 10.1111/irv.12103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Webster RK, et al. How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence. Public Health. 2020;163-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bish A, Michie S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(4):797–824. doi: 10.1348/135910710X485826. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types