Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jul 15;22(1):622.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04493-1.

Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system

Rachid Rassir et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) remains the gold standard for treatment of debilitating symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Even though providing satisfactory results for the majority of patients, some studies report dissatisfaction after TKA to be as high as 20%. Among other things, pain catastrophising and self-efficacy are thought to compromise results of TKA. Implant manufacturers keep improving upon their designs in an attempt to improve functional outcomes. One of these novel knee systems is the Attune. To our knowledge, there are no clinical follow-up studies reporting results of the uncemented version. The main objective of this multicentre prospective observational study is to evaluate revision rate, complications, radiographic outcomes (i.e. alignment and radiolucent lines) and patient reported outcomes of the uncemented Attune mobile bearing TKA. Secondary objectives are (1) to assess physical function, return to sport and return to work after TKA and (2) to evaluate the long-term effect of preoperative psychological factors on satisfaction after TKA.

Methods: All patients presenting in the participating centres with knee pathology warranting joint replacement therapy will be considered for inclusion, an absolute indication for cemented fixation is the only exclusion criterium. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic performance (e.g. radiolucent lines) is done at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years after surgery using validated patient reported outcome measures. Cumulative revision rates are calculated after 5 and 10 years using Kaplan-Meier methods. Physical function is assessed with performance based measurements before and 1 year after surgery. Return to sports is assessed using the Tegner and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scale before and 1 year after surgery. Return to work is evaluated by inviting patients of working age to complete a short questionnaire 1 year after surgery. Psychologic factors are assessed using questionnaires for pain catastrophising, pain self-efficacy and mental health before, 5 years and 10 years after surgery. Preoperative psychologic scores are correlated to functional outcomes.

Discussion: The current study aims to report the clinical performance of a novel implant and can help provide insight in factors that play a role in satisfaction after TKA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04247672 (January 30, 2020).

Keywords: Attune; Pain catastrophizing; Pain self-efficacy; Patient reported outcome measures; Sport; Survivorship; Total knee arthroplasty; Uncemented; Work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Oblique (a) and anteroposterior (b) view with landmark features of the uncemented Attune mobile bearing (“rotating platform”) implant (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana, USA). A gradually reducing radius of the femoral component (1) allows for more stability during flexion. The patellofemoral surface of the femoral component mimic the original anatomy more closely (2), providing more natural kinematics and patellar tracking during knee flexion. A porous coating on the 4 pegs and proximal part of the central cone provides an ideal environment for fixation (3). Images provided courtesy of DePuy Synthes

References

    1. Klug A, et al. The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020: 1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunaratne R, et al. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baert IA, et al. Does pre-surgical central modulation of pain influence outcome after total knee replacement? A systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(2):213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brander V, et al. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:21–26. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tolk JJ, et al. The influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: a randomized controlled trial: the EKSPECT study. Bone Joint J. 2021;103(4):619–626. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-0629.R3. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data