Finnish flow diverter study: 8 years of experience in the treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms
- PMID: 34266906
- PMCID: PMC9209683
- DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017641
Finnish flow diverter study: 8 years of experience in the treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms
Abstract
Background: Flow diversion of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is controversial due to high treatment-related complication rates and a lack of supporting evidence. We present clinical and radiological results of the largest series to date.
Methods: This is a nationwide retrospective study of acutely ruptured IAs treated with flow diverters (FDs). The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the last available follow-up time. Secondary outcomes were treatment-related complications and the aneurysm occlusion rate.
Results: 110 patients (64 females; mean age 55.7 years; range 12-82 years) with acutely ruptured IAs were treated with FDs between 2012 and 2020 in five centers. 70 acutely ruptured IAs (64%) were located in anterior circulation, and 47 acutely ruptured IAs (43%) were blister-like. A favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) was seen in 73% of patients (74/102). Treatment-related complications were seen in 45% of patients (n=49). Rebleeding was observed in 3 patients (3%). The data from radiological follow-ups were available for 80% of patients (n=88), and complete occlusion was seen in 90% of aneurysms (79/88). The data from clinical follow-ups were available for 93% of patients (n=102). The overall mortality rate was 18% (18/102).
Conclusions: FD treatment yields high occlusion for acutely ruptured IAs but is associated with a high risk of complications. Considering the high mortality rate of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, the prevention of rebleeding is crucial. Thus, FD treatment may be justified as a last resort option.
Keywords: Aneurysm; Flow Diverter; Hemorrhage; Stroke; Subarachnoid.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: KA has received personal research grants from Turku University Foundation and Maire Taponen Foundation. RRaj has received personal research grants from Finska Läkaresällskapet and Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv & Hälsä. RR is consultant for Microvention, Stryker and Medtronic.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Treatment of Ruptured Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysms by Acute Coiling Followed by Flow Diversion.World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:e162-e172. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 May 12. World Neurosurg. 2023. PMID: 37178914
-
Flow diversion treatment for acutely ruptured aneurysms.J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Mar;12(3):283-288. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015077. Epub 2019 Aug 24. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020. PMID: 31446429
-
Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with parent artery flow diverter devices: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Stroke. 2025 Jun;20(5):524-539. doi: 10.1177/17474930241307114. Epub 2024 Dec 24. Int J Stroke. 2025. PMID: 39614729
-
Pipeline flow diversion of ruptured blister aneurysms of the supraclinoid carotid artery using a single-device strategy.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1757. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28565992
-
Treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms using primary flow-diverter stenting with considerations for adjunctive coiling: A single-centre experience and literature review.Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Oct;23(5):465-476. doi: 10.1177/1591019917720805. Epub 2017 Jul 31. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 28758550 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center study with a standardized antithrombotic treatment protocol.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 11;166(1):130. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06029-7. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 38467916 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of staged coiling followed by flow diverter in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 10;48(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03174-6. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 39792194
-
The off-label uses of pipeline embolization device for complex cerebral aneurysms: Mid-term follow-up in a single center.Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr;31(2):158-167. doi: 10.1177/15910199221148800. Epub 2022 Dec 30. Interv Neuroradiol. 2025. PMID: 36583531 Free PMC article.
-
Long term WEB results - still going strong at 5 years?Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug;30(4):517-523. doi: 10.1177/15910199221139542. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Interv Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 36397733 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of safety and efficacy between double LVIS and flow diverter for Blister-Like aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study.Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05234-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40473888 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu L-M, et al. . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 - DOI - PubMed