Validating Habitual and Goal-Directed Decision-Making Performance Online in Healthy Older Adults
- PMID: 34267650
- PMCID: PMC8276057
- DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.702810
Validating Habitual and Goal-Directed Decision-Making Performance Online in Healthy Older Adults
Abstract
Everyday decision-making is supported by a dual-system of control comprised of parallel goal-directed and habitual systems. Over the past decade, the two-stage Markov decision task has become popularized for its ability to dissociate between goal-directed and habitual decision-making. While a handful of studies have implemented decision-making tasks online, only one study has validated the task by comparing in-person and web-based performance on the two-stage task in children and young adults. To date, no study has validated the dissociation of goal-directed and habitual behaviors in older adults online. Here, we implemented and validated a web-based version of the two-stage Markov task using parameter simulation and recovery and compared behavioral results from online and in-person participation on the two-stage task in both young and healthy older adults. We found no differences in estimated free parameters between online and in-person participation on the two-stage task. Further, we replicate previous findings that young adults are more goal-directed than older adults both in-person and online. Overall, this work demonstrates that the implementation and use of the two-stage Markov decision task for remote participation is feasible in the older adult demographic, which would allow for the study of decision-making with larger and more diverse samples.
Keywords: aging; decision-making; goal-directed; habitual; older adults; online; reinforcement learning; validating.
Copyright © 2021 Ito, Cao, Reinberg, Keller, Monterosso, Schweighofer and Liew.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Berinsky A. J., Huber G. A., Lenz G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk. Polit. Analy. 20 351–368. 10.1093/pan/mpr057 - DOI
-
- Casler K., Bickel L., Hackett E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29 2156–2160. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
